Ist unser Plombenmaterial biologisch inaktiv?

Ehrich, W

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-80489-2_69

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Diese Methode, die später u. a. auch von Lieb und Geeraets (1958) und Dohlmann und Mitarb. (1967) verwendet wurde, hat Ehrich seit 1975 zu einer standardisierten Methode ausgearbeitet; sie hat sich als zuverlassige biologische Arbeitsmethode erwiesen (Ehrich 1975(Ehrich , 1976(Ehrich , 1977(Ehrich , 1978(Ehrich , 1979(Ehrich , 1980(Ehrich , 1982(Ehrich , 1985Ehrich u. Mitarb. 1977, Ehrich und Polzhofer 1983, Ehrich und Harbauer 1984, Ehrich und Höh 1988, Becker u. Mitarb.…”

unclassified

IOL-Materialien im Vorderkammerimplantationstest

Ehrich

Höh²

1989

Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The biocompatibilities of two silicones ("Homburg" and "St. Wendel" silicone) and "Perspex CQ" (Titmus Eurocon Kontaktlinsen GmbH, Aschaffenburg) were tested in rabbits' eyes using the anterior chamber implantation test. Test criteria were iris folds, corneal opacification, fibrin flocks, and iris hyperemia. All the materials proved to be sufficiently biocompatible for use in the production of intraocular lenses. The two silicones appear to cause corneal opacification more often than "Perspex CQ". "Homburg" silicone only rarely seems to cause iris folds. There are no statistically significant differences in the biocompatibility of the tested materials. Clinical observations were in agreement with the test results.

show abstract

unclassified

IOL-Materialien im Vorderkammerimplantationstest

Ehrich

Höh²

1989

Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

PVAL im biologischen Prüfverfahren

Ehrich¹,

Höh²,

Damaske³

1978

Kunststoffimplantate in Der Ophthalmologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zur biologischen Vertr�glichkeit von vernetztem Polyurethan (PUR)

Ehrich

1978

Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Ophthalmol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After implantation of a disc (thickness: 0.25 mm, diam: 1.5 mm) of PUR in the anterior chamber of rabbits through a lancet incision, the reactions of iris, aqueous, and cornea were observed for six months at regular intervals using slit-lamp photography. 'Steeping' materials were as compatible as nonsteeping materials. At the place where the disc touched the iris one could see during a half-year period hyperemia iridis and foreign-substance granuloma of the iris. The cause of these reactions is a toxin in the PUR. Mechanical irritants as a cause could be excluded through the method utilized in the experiment.

show abstract

Ist unser Plombenmaterial biologisch inaktiv?

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

IOL-Materialien im Vorderkammerimplantationstest

IOL-Materialien im Vorderkammerimplantationstest

PVAL im biologischen Prüfverfahren

Zur biologischen Vertr�glichkeit von vernetztem Polyurethan (PUR)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About