2007
DOI: 10.22163/fteval.2007.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IST Evaluation and Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true for the mix of policies that influence innovation, directly or indirectly. In the context of R&D and innovation policy, the difficulties as well as the methods have been described by Fahrenkrog et al (2002), Ruegg and Feller (2003), Polt and Vonortas (2006) and OECD (2006). The focus of evaluation and impact toolboxes is on financial support for R&D. Increasingly, toolboxes and articles address the impact of ''soft'' elements of innovation policy, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for the mix of policies that influence innovation, directly or indirectly. In the context of R&D and innovation policy, the difficulties as well as the methods have been described by Fahrenkrog et al (2002), Ruegg and Feller (2003), Polt and Vonortas (2006) and OECD (2006). The focus of evaluation and impact toolboxes is on financial support for R&D. Increasingly, toolboxes and articles address the impact of ''soft'' elements of innovation policy, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques may be used singly or in combination (mixed methods/ triangulation); they may entail collection of primary data or use of secondary data; they may be based on simple linear or complex, non-linear relationships; and they may be directed at one or more of the outputs, outcomes, and impacts associated with a program's objectives. Selection of the most appropriate methodologies, singly or in combination, will depend on the specific objectives and uses for which the evaluation is designed and the audiences for whom the evaluation is intended (Polt and Vonortas, 2006).…”
Section: Figure 11 the Facets And Uses Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the mix of instruments, the sequence in which tools are deployed, and the ways in which elements derived from the different tools employed are merged in the overall analysis are central to the success of an evaluation (Georghiou and Laredo, 2006). Multiple techniques are combined to offset the limitations of specific approaches, to complement one another such that the findings generated by one approach (for example, surveys) are used as datasets in constructing variables used in other approaches (for example, econometric estimation), and to triangulate findings as a means of increasing the confidence that program impacts have been correctly identified and located (Polt and Vonortas, 2006).…”
Section: Figure 11 the Facets And Uses Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation