2016
DOI: 10.7249/rr1476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues with Access to Acquisition Data and Information in the Department of Defense: A Closer Look at the Origins and Implementation of Controlled Unclassified Information Labels and Security Policy

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed the DoD against these practices by comparing the DoD's status (as identified in prior research [Riposo et al, 2015;McKernan et al, 2016McKernan et al, , 2017McKernan et al, , 2018 and recent DoD information-management meetings against these best practices. Comparison is straightforward, identifying whether key private-sector practices are being used by the DoD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the DoD against these practices by comparing the DoD's status (as identified in prior research [Riposo et al, 2015;McKernan et al, 2016McKernan et al, , 2017McKernan et al, , 2018 and recent DoD information-management meetings against these best practices. Comparison is straightforward, identifying whether key private-sector practices are being used by the DoD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…140 Proprietary markings may properly designate data as Controlled Unclassified Information. See, generally, McKernan et al, 2016. But the marking is inappropriate when asserting restrictions to the government's data rights.…”
Section: Gaps In the Ip Rights-determination Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we documented where data reside, who can access the data, and who owns the information in 21 information systems. This builds on our earlier work (Riposo et al, 2015, andMcKernan et al, 2016) by exploring in more detail the data that support decisionmaking.…”
Section: © Copyright 2017 Rand Corporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 They are critical to such initiatives as Better Buying Power and its efforts to improve defense acquisition. Previous RAND Corporation research has explored issues with access to acquisition data and information and the origins and implementation of controlled unclassified information labels and security policy (Riposo et al, 2015;McKernan et al, 2016). The work reported here, conducted for the Acquisition Resources and Analysis Directorate in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, builds on the earlier research by reviewing 21 acquisitiondata systems, their origins and uses, and how acquisition data might be improved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation