1986
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.41.8.879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues to consider in conducting nonsexist psychological research: A guide for researchers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
155
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
155
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence from other areas of research to show that the presence of a person of opposite sex can have a powerful influence, especially on sex-role stereotyped forms of behavior [21], [22], [23]. Furthermore, research has shown that subjects sometimes alter their self-presentation strategies in a manner that transforms others' gender-related expectations into self-fulfilling prophecies [24], [25].…”
Section: Gender and Social Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence from other areas of research to show that the presence of a person of opposite sex can have a powerful influence, especially on sex-role stereotyped forms of behavior [21], [22], [23]. Furthermore, research has shown that subjects sometimes alter their self-presentation strategies in a manner that transforms others' gender-related expectations into self-fulfilling prophecies [24], [25].…”
Section: Gender and Social Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The androcentric practices described here provide a new vantage point from which to view debates about the science and politics of comparing women and men. In the past, psychologists have been enjoined to avoid exaggerating gender differences (Baumeister, 1988;Favreau, 1997;McHugh, Koeske, & Frieze, 1986;Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1990), to report similarities and small differences (Rothblum, 1988), to report empirical differences as accurately as possible (Eagly, 1995), and to trust in the value neutrality of a 'free marketplace of ideas' (Scarr, 1988).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within and beyond psychology there has been repeated concern that such lenses impact the ways that psychological differences between females and males are reported and interpreted. Debates have focused on gender polarization; the exaggeration of gender differences (Baumeister, 1988;Favreau, 1997;Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1990;Hyde, 2005;Kitzinger, 1994;McHugh, Koeske, & Frieze, 1986;Mednick, 1989), and on biological essentialism; the premature attribution of gender differences to immutable biological factors (e.g., Brescoll & LaFrance, 2004;Mahalingam, 2003;Martin & Parker, 1995;McHugh, Koeske, & Frieze, 1986). The current article aims to call attention to the third lens of androcentrism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, there is a lack of cumulative knowledge, adequate conceptualisation, and theory building (Carter, Anderson et al, 2003, p. 72), and "women's entrepreneurship has mostly been studied from the very limited perspective of the differences between men and women" (Ahl, 2004, p. 34). She goes on to argue that entrepreneurship is itself a male-gendered concept that requires a particular gendered division of labor (Ahl, 2004, p. 61).As Ahl (2006) has more recently pointed out, the terms sex and gender (originally introduced to distinguish between socially constructed sex [sex-related differences, or the factors that vary with sex; McHugh, Koeske, & Frieze, 1986;Unger, 1979] and biological sex) have been widely conflated in the entrepreneurship literature. One consequence is to 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%