2003
DOI: 10.1258/000456303322326470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues of methodology, standardization and metabolite recognition for 25-hydroxyvitamin D when comparing the DiaSorin radioimmunoassay and the Nichols Advantage automated chemiluminescence protein-binding assay in hip fracture cases

Abstract: The discordance between 25-OHD values may be due to differences in standardization of each assay relative to HPLC. Our results emphasize the need for assay-specific clinical decision limits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The replacement of the traditional RIA with nonisotopically labeled assays has allowed automation of the analysis; however, recent studies have suggested that both the Nichols Advantage automated chemiluminescence protein-binding assay and, to a lesser extent, the IDS RIA underrecover 25-OH D 2 compared with HPLC analysis (22,23 ). Recent publications have highlighted the interlaboratory variability of 25-OH D analysis on patient samples measured by RIA and chemiluminescence assays (24 ) and quality assurance material (22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replacement of the traditional RIA with nonisotopically labeled assays has allowed automation of the analysis; however, recent studies have suggested that both the Nichols Advantage automated chemiluminescence protein-binding assay and, to a lesser extent, the IDS RIA underrecover 25-OH D 2 compared with HPLC analysis (22,23 ). Recent publications have highlighted the interlaboratory variability of 25-OH D analysis on patient samples measured by RIA and chemiluminescence assays (24 ) and quality assurance material (22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assay-related underrepresentation of serum 25OHD concentrations in subjects taking vitamin D supplements was considered, and is possible, in view of the recently reported Nichols' Advantage assay's inadequacy in measuring exogenous sources of vitamin D 2 . 41,42 Nevertheless, our screened subjects were not receiving therapeutic doses of vitamin D 2 (>800 IU of vitamin D 2 ) when their serum 25OHD concentration was measured. Two of the 3 studies in pediatric subjects with IBD to report vitamin D status used a serum 25OHD concentration <15 ng/mL as the cutoff value for vitamin D deficiency and could have, as a result, underestimated the prevalence of this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Recent studies have found this assay to be inadequate in measuring exogenous sources of vitamin D 2 . 41,42 To further investigate whether possible assay-related underrepresentation of serum 25OHD concentrations contributed (especially in patients who reported taking vitamin D supplements) to the lack of a relationship between serum PTH and 25OHD concentration, we performed the analysis separately for participants who reported taking vitamin D supplements and those who did not, and we still did not find a significant relationship (Spearman's ρ (r) = 0.13, P = .57 in those not taking vitamin D supplements; r = −0.12, P = .26 in those taking such supplements). To account for effects of puberty, we evaluated the relationship between serum PTH and 25OHD concentrations separately in patients ≤18 years and those >18 years, and we still did not find it to be significant (Spearman's ρ (r) = −0.05, P = .64 in patients ≤18 years; r = −0.43, P = .11 in patients >18 years).…”
Section: Relationships Between Serum 25ohd Concentration and Bone Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay underestimated 25-OHD at low levels and overestimated 25-OHD at high levels resulting in a substantial misclassifi cation of patients (5) . A comparison of the Nichols Advantage assay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) also revealed problems with assay linearity (6) and individual patient results were highly variable.…”
Section: Markus Herrmannmentioning
confidence: 95%