2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation—The case of Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, authors of "Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia" compared French, German, Japanese and Dutch Wikipedia [22] while "Cross-cultural analysis of the Wikipedia community" analyzed English, Hebrew, Japanese, and Malay [10]. Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias were compared by Stvilia et al [25]. These analysis were performed with manual content analysis of some article pages from the different Wikipedias.…”
Section: Language Wikipedia Communities and Their Points Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, authors of "Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia" compared French, German, Japanese and Dutch Wikipedia [22] while "Cross-cultural analysis of the Wikipedia community" analyzed English, Hebrew, Japanese, and Malay [10]. Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias were compared by Stvilia et al [25]. These analysis were performed with manual content analysis of some article pages from the different Wikipedias.…”
Section: Language Wikipedia Communities and Their Points Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these, other articles that studied featured articles are discussed elsewhere in this review (Viégas, Wattenberg & McKeon 2007;Stvilia et al 2009;Goldspink 2009;Goldspink 2010 …”
Section: Featured Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They oun significant correlation, indicating the influence o people's cul u l ckg oun on he con u on behavior on Wikipedia, and the Internet in general. Stvilia et al (2009) found that "different Wikipedia communities may have different understandings of and models for quality" (2009, p.232). They also demonstrated "the feasibility of using some article edit-based metrics for automated quality measurement across different Wikipedia contexts" (2009, p.232).…”
Section: Cultural and Linguistic Effects On Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying such a system, encyclopedia articles can be more quickly classified, and essays that might damage and discredit the can be promptly removed or revised validity Wikipedia and users trust quickly removed or revised. According to the results achieved by Stvilia et al [51] in 2009 which showed that different communities have different models for measuring quality, the researchers of this paper have recommended such research to be done in other languages of Wikipedia encyclopaedia and its results utilized for raising the quality of encyclopaedia articles. The purpose of this study was to find the variables that would affect the quality of the Persian Wikipedia encyclopedia articles.…”
Section: Summery and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%