2010
DOI: 10.2989/16073614.2010.548016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues of complexity in reading: Putting Occam's razor aside for now

Abstract: In this article Occam's razor is used as metaphor to show how different conceptualisations of reading have tended to shave off or exclude important reading variables from their accounts, thus compromising our understanding of reading as a complex phenomenon. It is argued that, although reading and language are inextricably bound, reading is a highly complex system in its own right and, as such, approaches to reading should take account of this complexity and build it into their explanations of how reading work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.3.6 Socioeconomic Status, the School System and Reading Proficiency As pointed out earlier, socioeconomic status influences learners' reading proficiency (Pretorius, 2010;Taylor & Yu, 2009). The socioeconomic status of a student may determine the school he/she would attend, and the school, in turn, influences factors such as the amount of exposure to texts, methods of reading instruction, and the frequency of reading (Currin & Pretorius, 2010;Taylor & Yu, 2009;Van Staden & Bosker, 2011).…”
Section: Attitude Towards Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.3.6 Socioeconomic Status, the School System and Reading Proficiency As pointed out earlier, socioeconomic status influences learners' reading proficiency (Pretorius, 2010;Taylor & Yu, 2009). The socioeconomic status of a student may determine the school he/she would attend, and the school, in turn, influences factors such as the amount of exposure to texts, methods of reading instruction, and the frequency of reading (Currin & Pretorius, 2010;Taylor & Yu, 2009;Van Staden & Bosker, 2011).…”
Section: Attitude Towards Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading comprehension is, therefore, the goal of literacy instruction. A necessary but not sufficient component for reading comprehension is fluent word-reading (Snowling & Hulme 2005;Pretorius 2010), which itself relies on automaticity and accuracy in lower-level reading skills. These lower-level skills include phonological awareness (ability to attend to and manipulate the sound structure of a language; Adams 1990), word recognition (ability to recognise a printed word and to connect the visual print form to its phonological string and sematic meaning; Grabe 2012) and reading fluency (automatic and accurate word recognition; Fuchs et al 2001;Hedgcock & Ferris 2018).…”
Section: The Foundations Of Reading Comprehension: Word Recognition Fluency and Language Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the notion of 'comprehension' is described and situated within a socio-cognitive model of reading literacy, in which reading is viewed as a highly complex phenomenon comprising many cognitive-linguistic skills and component processes that tap into various knowledge bases, all of which are embedded within a social matrix (Pretorius, 2010). The act of reading is thus both an individual cognitive-linguistic accomplishment, as well as socially constituted practice.…”
Section: Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%