2017
DOI: 10.1159/000477398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in Identification and Assessment of Children with Autism and a Proposed Resource Toolkit for Speech-Language Pathologists

Abstract: Background:The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has increased significantly in the last decade as have treatment choices. Nonetheless, the vastly diverse autism topic includes issues related to naming, description, identification, assessment, and differentiation from other neurodevelopmental conditions. ASD issues directly impact speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who often see these children as the second contact, after pediatric medical practitioners. Because of shared symptomology, differentiat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referrals to a speech and language pathologist (SLP), physical/occupational therapist, or neurologist were coded as “other” referrals because they are not specific for a concern for autism. Not all SLPs are trained to diagnose ASD; thus, a referral to speech pathology may further delay a patient’s developmental evaluation and subsequent ASD diagnosis (Hus, 2017). According to Doehring and Volkmar (2016), “[policy] requirements for the use of observations, the types of evaluators, the choice of assessment tools, and the need for family input varied widely from state to state.”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referrals to a speech and language pathologist (SLP), physical/occupational therapist, or neurologist were coded as “other” referrals because they are not specific for a concern for autism. Not all SLPs are trained to diagnose ASD; thus, a referral to speech pathology may further delay a patient’s developmental evaluation and subsequent ASD diagnosis (Hus, 2017). According to Doehring and Volkmar (2016), “[policy] requirements for the use of observations, the types of evaluators, the choice of assessment tools, and the need for family input varied widely from state to state.”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic early screening, however, was not recommended by US health authorities as the costs tended to exceed the benefits, unless children are signaled by their primary caretakers and/or diagnosed with a developmental delay (p.32). 20…”
Section: The Rise Of Autism Prevalence and Parallel Costmentioning
confidence: 99%