Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and Trends in Sign Language Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, hearing native signers do not always exhibit the same level of fluency as deaf native signers, despite being exposed to ASL from birth (e.g., Hauser et al, 2008;Supalla et al, 2014). One explanation for this finding is the "24/7" effect (Paludneviciene et al, 2012). That is, deaf native signers use ASL all day in all situations while hearing native signers use spoken English for much more of their day.…”
Section: Discriminant Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, hearing native signers do not always exhibit the same level of fluency as deaf native signers, despite being exposed to ASL from birth (e.g., Hauser et al, 2008;Supalla et al, 2014). One explanation for this finding is the "24/7" effect (Paludneviciene et al, 2012). That is, deaf native signers use ASL all day in all situations while hearing native signers use spoken English for much more of their day.…”
Section: Discriminant Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many challenges for developing tests for ASL proficiency because it is not possible to simply translate English-based tests into ASL. The development of ASL assessments must take into consideration our current understanding of the structure of ASL based on linguistic research and current practices in psychological testing (see Paludneviciene, Hauser, Daggett, & Kurz, 2012 for a discussion on the specific challenges in sign language test development).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike the deaf signers, hearing signers also showed an enlarged surface area in the right ATL, suggesting that there may be some differences in how hearing vs. deaf signers process and integrate perceptual information from face and body movements. Hearing signers may process facial expressions differently because they do not communicate in signed language as extensively as deaf signers (Paludneviciene et al 2012).…”
Section: Surface-based Morphometric Analysis 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASL-CMP was created by a team of deaf native-signing linguists and educators and hearing linguists who are familiar with ASL. Deaf experts who have technical expertise as well as mastery of the language play a critical role in ensuring validity of ASL assessments (Hoffmeister, 1988;Paludneviciene et al, 2012;Hoffmeister et al, 2015;Enns et al, 2016;Henner et al, 2018). The ASL-CMP was developed as a subtest of the ASLAI, a large, comprehensive, norm-referenced ASL assessment.…”
Section: Development Of the Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%