1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada253323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and Techniques of CASE Integration With Configuration Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workspaces can be separated physically from the versioned database [Rochkind 1975], or be realized as updatable database views (virtual workspaces, e.g., virtual file systems [Leblang 1994;Fowler et al 1994]). Current SCM systems focus on integration of file-based tools and offer poor support for integrating tools operating on databases (e.g., CASE tools [Wallnau 1992]). The problem of integrating heterogeneous database systems without sacrificing their autonomy is addressed by federated database systems [Sheth and Larson 1990] and data warehouses [Hammer et al 1995].…”
Section: Related Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workspaces can be separated physically from the versioned database [Rochkind 1975], or be realized as updatable database views (virtual workspaces, e.g., virtual file systems [Leblang 1994;Fowler et al 1994]). Current SCM systems focus on integration of file-based tools and offer poor support for integrating tools operating on databases (e.g., CASE tools [Wallnau 1992]). The problem of integrating heterogeneous database systems without sacrificing their autonomy is addressed by federated database systems [Sheth and Larson 1990] and data warehouses [Hammer et al 1995].…”
Section: Related Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This separation of the Process Controller into environment services and process enactment layers reflects work carried at the SEI [2], [ 16] and with the Navy Next Generation Computer Resources (NGCR) Project Support Environment Working Group (PSEWG) [ 13]. Figure 7 (derived from [16]) identifies the process enactment and environment services layers of our Process Controller, and places them in context with framework services.…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 7 (derived from [16]) identifies the process enactment and environment services layers of our Process Controller, and places them in context with framework services. While the environment services defined in our environment are not complete when compared with ~ 'rocess Enactment Environment Services ~ J Figure 7.…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is it necessary to make fundamental change to the implementation of CASE and CM tools that obviously is not welcome by most vendors? Wallnau try to address key issues of integration of CASE and CM from a third-party integrator's perspective in [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%