2014
DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the number of repeat measures per individual was not constant (due to availability and exercise regime of the animals) and the repeated measures were taken on different days and under different environmental conditions (resulting in variable resting body temperatures), the use of a Bland-Altman plot was deemed inappropriate (Hartnack, 2014). A scatter plot was instead used to provide a visual assessment of the difference between the two sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of repeat measures per individual was not constant (due to availability and exercise regime of the animals) and the repeated measures were taken on different days and under different environmental conditions (resulting in variable resting body temperatures), the use of a Bland-Altman plot was deemed inappropriate (Hartnack, 2014). A scatter plot was instead used to provide a visual assessment of the difference between the two sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiterhin werden die "limits of agreement" (loa) angegeben, welche die systematische Messabweichung von ±1,96×Standardabweichung angeben. Sie zeigen, wie weit voneinander entfernt die Ergebnisse der Messmethoden sind (Hartnack 2014 …”
Section: Einführungunclassified
“…More recent studies [11][12][13][14] draw conclusions based on mean bias and limits of agreement between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement techniques. A recent perspective paper [15] argues against the use of classic Bland-Altman plots and linear regression, and for the use of linear mixed effects models as a method to compare measurement techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%