2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and considerations in the use of serologic biomarkers for classifying vaccination history in household surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No regional differences in immunity were noted in the polio, measles, and rubella serosurveys in Cambodia (27). Determination of true population immunity by serosurvey is helpful in light of the challenges of collecting accurate vaccination histories (14,35). Six tetanus doses are required for lifelong immunity when vaccination is begun in infancy, but childhood vaccination records are rarely available for data abstraction in surveys of adult women (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No regional differences in immunity were noted in the polio, measles, and rubella serosurveys in Cambodia (27). Determination of true population immunity by serosurvey is helpful in light of the challenges of collecting accurate vaccination histories (14,35). Six tetanus doses are required for lifelong immunity when vaccination is begun in infancy, but childhood vaccination records are rarely available for data abstraction in surveys of adult women (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (13). Serosurveys could be used to monitor progress toward the achievement and maintenance of MNTE given challenges of reliably assessing TT coverage through vaccination history (14). For in vitro assays of tetanus seroprotection, gold standards are the DAE (double-antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) and toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) tests, which are not commercially available (15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can help to elucidate reasons for outbreaks and evaluate the impact of vaccination campaigns on population immunity. There is also great interest in using serological data to infer routine vaccination coverage .…”
Section: Uses Of Seroepidemiological Data For Vaccination Programme Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore interest in using seroprevalence as an indicator of coverage of infant or adult vaccination. To infer vaccination coverage from seroprevalence data, either there must be no natural infection occurring in the area or antibody induced by vaccine should be distinguishable from that following infection; there should be known vaccine immunogenicity under a wide range of programme conditions, antibody should have known duration after primary vaccination and the appropriate age group should be studied, and antibody levels should correlate with the number of doses of vaccine received and be identified precisely and accurately by a field‐friendly assay .…”
Section: Estimation Of Routine Vaccination Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior efforts to study epidemic survivors retrospectively have primarily been confined to serologic surveys. Positive serology can identify individuals who have been exposed to a particular pathogen, and antibody titers can be used to assess adaptive immunity, but these are not highly precise measures of the host response (MacNeil et al, 2014). Serotypic crossreactivity between structurally similar epitopes conserved among or within viral taxa can make it difficult to distinguish specific pathogen strains or species, and antibody titers can vary dramatically between individuals and decrease over time.…”
Section: Tracking Viruses With Host Response Datamentioning
confidence: 99%