1987
DOI: 10.2307/1163729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and Case Studies in Teacher Incentive Plans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merit pay programs are typically defined as providing rewards to individual teachers for outstanding performance. Several studies have sought to understand why merit pay programs are rarely institutionalized (Educational Research Service, 1978;Hatry, Greiner, & Ashford, 1994;Jacobson, 1987;Johnson, 1986;Murnane & Cohen, 1986). Nearly all have reached the same conclusions:…”
Section: Teacher Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Merit pay programs are typically defined as providing rewards to individual teachers for outstanding performance. Several studies have sought to understand why merit pay programs are rarely institutionalized (Educational Research Service, 1978;Hatry, Greiner, & Ashford, 1994;Jacobson, 1987;Johnson, 1986;Murnane & Cohen, 1986). Nearly all have reached the same conclusions:…”
Section: Teacher Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cornett (1994) found that in Arizona, among students taught by teachers in the career ladder program, achievement increased, dropout rates declined, and graduation rates increased. Despite these successes, career ladder programs tend to be short-lived, and most of the programs established in the 1980s were phased out by the mid-1990s (Hatry, Greiner, & Ashford, 1994). One explanation for the lack of long-term commitment to career ladder programs is that the programs tend to be costly.…”
Section: Teacher Paymentioning
confidence: 99%