2013
DOI: 10.1080/10618562.2012.753146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISPH modelling of transient natural convection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They introduced a new variant of the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of the natural convection phenomena. Danis et al [26] modeled the transient and laminar natural convection in a square cavity using SPH method with a discretization tool on uniform Eulerian grids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduced a new variant of the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of the natural convection phenomena. Danis et al [26] modeled the transient and laminar natural convection in a square cavity using SPH method with a discretization tool on uniform Eulerian grids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, should a "weakly compressible" approach be adopted, the non-iterative SPH algorithms are simplified [8].The limits of SPH models are linked to slightly higher computational costs, complex procedures for the local refining of spatial resolution, and a relatively low accuracy for classical CFD applications where mesh-based models are well-validated (e.g., confined mono-phase flows [8]). However, they are effectively employed in several fields [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].Various flood propagation studies have focused on the use of the SPH method to investigate dam-break events [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Having implemented an SPH scheme to treat a dam-break problem in a two-phase approach, Colagrossi and Landrini [19] discussed the effects of density-ratio variations and air entrapment on loads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits of SPH models are linked to slightly higher computational costs, complex procedures for the local refining of spatial resolution, and a relatively low accuracy for classical CFD applications where mesh-based models are well-validated (e.g., confined mono-phase flows [8]). However, they are effectively employed in several fields [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past couple of decades, this meshfree Lagrangian method became popular in many branches of computational fluid dynamics, such as hydrodynamics (Lee 2007), heat transfer (Danis et al 2013) and fluid-solid interaction (Amini et al 2011). Traditionally, the pressure is explicitly evaluated from a weakly compressible equation of state, which enforces another time step criterion related to a virtual speed of sound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the aforementioned problems of Lagrangian methods, it seems tempting to use an Eulerian frame of reference in a meshfree method such as SPH. Danis et al (2013) used ISPH and Boussinesq approximation to model transient natural convection in a square cavity for an Eulerian uniform grid, to show the upper limit of the accuracy of the SPH method in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%