2002
DOI: 10.1177/027836402128964666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotropic Design of Spatial Parallel Manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For C F , C d the ordering is respected although the changes in the index are relatively small for C F . On the other hand there is a surprisingly decrease of C 3 2 , C 3 F between P 2 and P 1 while there is a significant increase between P 1 and P 3 . Hence none of this condition numbers exhibits a completely coherent behavior with respect to the accuracy of this robot.…”
Section: Condition Numbermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For C F , C d the ordering is respected although the changes in the index are relatively small for C F . On the other hand there is a surprisingly decrease of C 3 2 , C 3 F between P 2 and P 1 while there is a significant increase between P 1 and P 3 . Hence none of this condition numbers exhibits a completely coherent behavior with respect to the accuracy of this robot.…”
Section: Condition Numbermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The condition number of the Jacobian matrix was first used by Salisbury and Craig (1982) to design mechanical fingers and developed by as a kinetostatic performance index of the robotic mechanical systems. The isotropic design aims at ideal kinematic and dynamic performance of the manipulator (Fattah and Ghasemi 2002). In an isotropic configuration, the sensitivity of a manipulator is minimal with regard to both velocity and force errors and the manipulator can be controlled equally well in all directions.…”
Section: Types Of Parallel Robots With Respect To Motion Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ > 0 and in general ρ = 1. This choice is motivated by the 3-way symmetry inherent in the manipulator architecture, and the set of configurations is more general than those studied in [10,11,3,1].…”
Section: Architecture Configuration Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consequence of this approach is the concurrence of kinematic and static isotropy, where the later implies the ability of the manipulator endeffector to resist forces and moments equally well in all spatial directions. Among the spatial parallel manipulators, the Stewart platform manipulator (SPM) has been studied by several researchers for isotropy [1,2,3,4]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no mechanically feasible, non-singular isotropic configuration has been obtained for a manipulator of this class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%