2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotropic continuum damage/repair model for alveolar bone remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), as discussed in Hillsley and Frangos (1994), Cowin (2002), Qin et al (2003), McGarry et al (2005), Kafka (1993), and Nguyen et al (2010) for instance. Other approaches rely on 'solid' quantities arising from additional constitutive mechanisms, such as micro-damage, see Zidi (1999, 2001), Mengoni and Ponthot (2010), with or without the influence of an interstitial fluid, as in Tami et al (2002), and Rouhi et al (2006), or viscosity in Baïotto and Zidi (2009) that leads to a first-order system, introducing a constitutive characteristic time. The present work also introduces a characteristic time, relying on hydraulic diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), as discussed in Hillsley and Frangos (1994), Cowin (2002), Qin et al (2003), McGarry et al (2005), Kafka (1993), and Nguyen et al (2010) for instance. Other approaches rely on 'solid' quantities arising from additional constitutive mechanisms, such as micro-damage, see Zidi (1999, 2001), Mengoni and Ponthot (2010), with or without the influence of an interstitial fluid, as in Tami et al (2002), and Rouhi et al (2006), or viscosity in Baïotto and Zidi (2009) that leads to a first-order system, introducing a constitutive characteristic time. The present work also introduces a characteristic time, relying on hydraulic diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, Doblaré and García (2002); García et al (2002)'s model is firstly enhanced to be coupled to an elasto-plastic material behaviour in a finite strain framework (see Mengoni and Ponthot (2010) for an isotropic version of this elasto-plastic damage coupling). The new model can therefore capture 24 permanent strains of the tissue beyond the ones due to the density variation only.…”
Section: The Remodelling Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield criterion is expressed for the undamaged material, here the fully mineralised bone. Actually, this anisotropic model is applied to trabecular bone only while the cortical bone is considered as initially isotropic and remaining isotropic during remodelling, thus following an isotropic version of this anisotropic model (Mengoni and Ponthot, 2010).…”
Section: Phenomenological Remodelling Model Expressed In the Continuumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice was dictated by the potential of application of the phenomenological models to other classes of materials, such as composite materials [35], or living tissues for biomechanical applications. In the latest case, the damage/remodeling processes associated to living bones can be easily dealt with using phenomenological models because in such a situation the damage variable is not an actual damage of the tissue but a measure of the bone density that can increase or decrease as a function of the biological processes involved [28].Moreover, authors who use a damage formulation generally tend to limit their model to only one hardening law coupled to one damage model. The present work is based on a generic phenomenological damage formulation that allows us to couple any hardening law with any damage model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%