2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-1029-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopy and energy of physical networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modularity-based network community detection [9,10,12] is arguably the most popular framework for identifying communities in networks, partly because of its already established status quo including various numerical tools on top of its mathematically intuitive interpretation of detecting densely connected subsets of nodes. The most widely used type of modularity function for a given community partition {g i } ( g i represents the community identity of node i) is given by where the adjacency matrix elements A ij represent the existence of an edge between nodes i and j ( A ij = 1 if the edge exists and A ij = 0 if it does not), 4 and the degree k i represents the number of neighbors of node i and is given by…”
Section: Modified Null-model Term For Bipartite Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modularity-based network community detection [9,10,12] is arguably the most popular framework for identifying communities in networks, partly because of its already established status quo including various numerical tools on top of its mathematically intuitive interpretation of detecting densely connected subsets of nodes. The most widely used type of modularity function for a given community partition {g i } ( g i represents the community identity of node i) is given by where the adjacency matrix elements A ij represent the existence of an edge between nodes i and j ( A ij = 1 if the edge exists and A ij = 0 if it does not), 4 and the degree k i represents the number of neighbors of node i and is given by…”
Section: Modified Null-model Term For Bipartite Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the way to reality, however, they have encountered various types of constraints imposed in different systems. For instance, a network may represent relations in a physical space where one must take spatial constraints into account [4], e.g., spatial networks [5] with physical restrictions such as the no edge-crossing rule [6]. One of the most prominent types of networks with such restrictions is the bipartite network [1,7]: a network composed of two distinct groups of nodes, where edges can only connect nodes belonging to different groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent research into large networks, such as the brain, has focused on the threedimensional layout of the network, which affects the structure and function of the system. The results of [2] allow formulating a statistical model for the formation of tangles in physical networks, with finding that the mouse connectome is more entangled than expected based on optimal wiring. In [3], general hierarchical models of consciousness were constructed, including equations governing the cooperative variables for several cognitive modalities: semantic and working memory, attention, emotion, perception, and their sequential interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the way to reality, however, they have encountered various types of constraints imposed in different systems. For instance, a network may represent relations in the physical space where one must take spatial constraints into account [4], e.g., spatial networks [5] with physical restrictions such as no edge-crossing rule [6]. One of the most prominent types of networks with such restrictions is the bipartite network [1,7]: the networks composed of two distinct groups of nodes, where edges can only connect nodes belonging to different groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%