1959
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(59)90112-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic geochemistry of sulphur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This accords with the average d 34 S value of + 2.4 per mil obtained by Ault and Kulp (1959) for sulfides in and associated with mafic igneous rocks. The sulfides in the gneissic wall rocks are isotopically heavier than those in the ultramafic body proper.…”
Section: Hiturasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This accords with the average d 34 S value of + 2.4 per mil obtained by Ault and Kulp (1959) for sulfides in and associated with mafic igneous rocks. The sulfides in the gneissic wall rocks are isotopically heavier than those in the ultramafic body proper.…”
Section: Hiturasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3 Frequency distribution of stable isotope ratios of sulfur in freshwater sulfate, freshwater prey, freshwater fish, marine fish, marine zoo plankton and marine water sulfate obtained from the literature (Ault and Kulp 1959;Thode et al 1961;Hartmann and Nielsen 1964;Sasaki 1972;Gormly and Sackett 1977;Rees et al 1978;Fry 1983;Nriagu and Soon 1985;Peterson et al 1985;Fuller et al 1986;Fry 1988;Hesslein et al 1988Hesslein et al , 1991Krouse and Herbert 1988;Nriagu et al 1991;Andersson et al 1992;Caron et al 1996;Yang et al 1996;MacAvoy et al 1998;Chanton and Lewis 1999;Doucett et al 1999a, b;Power et al 2002;Weber et al 2002;Spence and (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfates removed by exhaustive extraction of the same sample, i.e., solid sulfate, gave a value of-14.4"/oo. This value is unusual for sulfates and lies in the range of values of sedimentary sulfides, and free sulfur of biogenic origin (Ault and Kulp, 1959). It may represent reoxidation of sulfur previously fractionated by microbiotic reduction of sulfates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%