2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518183113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic evidence for primordial molecular cloud material in metal-rich carbonaceous chondrites

Abstract: The short-lived 26 Al radionuclide is thought to have been admixed into the initially 26 Al-poor protosolar molecular cloud before or contemporaneously with its collapse. Bulk inner Solar System reservoirs record positively correlated variability in mass-independent 54 Cr and 26 Mg*, the decay product of 26 Al. This correlation is interpreted as reflecting progressive thermal processing of infalling 26 Al-rich molecular cloud material in the inner Solar System. The thermally unprocessed molecular cloud matter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
124
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(131 reference statements)
18
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the absolute isotopic dates of individual chondrules suggest that the formation of these objects started contemporaneously with the condensation and melting of CAIs and lasted 3.5 Myr (Connelly et al 2012), which indicate the existence of multiple generations of chondrules within individual chondrites. Moreover, variability in the titanium and chromium stable isotope compositions of chondrules from individual chondrites suggests that these objects or their precursor was formed in distinct regions of the protoplanetary disk and subsequently transported to the accretion regions of their respective parent bodies (Trinquier et al 2009;Van Kooten et al 2016;Olsen et al 2016). These data are at odds with the traditional view of a short formation history for chondrule population from individual chondrites, the basic concept of chondrulematrix complementarity as well as the timescales and style of chondrite parent body accretion.…”
Section: Fig 62mentioning
(Expert classified)
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the absolute isotopic dates of individual chondrules suggest that the formation of these objects started contemporaneously with the condensation and melting of CAIs and lasted 3.5 Myr (Connelly et al 2012), which indicate the existence of multiple generations of chondrules within individual chondrites. Moreover, variability in the titanium and chromium stable isotope compositions of chondrules from individual chondrites suggests that these objects or their precursor was formed in distinct regions of the protoplanetary disk and subsequently transported to the accretion regions of their respective parent bodies (Trinquier et al 2009;Van Kooten et al 2016;Olsen et al 2016). These data are at odds with the traditional view of a short formation history for chondrule population from individual chondrites, the basic concept of chondrulematrix complementarity as well as the timescales and style of chondrite parent body accretion.…”
Section: Fig 62mentioning
(Expert classified)
“…It has been suggested that the observed dichotomy in the abundance of the 54 Cr tracer between carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous chondrites essentially reflects distinct accretion regions of their parent bodies, namely that the carbonaceous material formed beyond the snow line whereas the non-carbonaceous material originated Sunward of the snow line (Larsen et al 2016;Warren 2011). Accretion of the carbonaceous chondrites beyond the snow line is in accord with the much higher water content of these meteorites (Robert and Epstein 1982;Kerridge 1985) compared to that of enstatite and ordinary chondrites (McNaughton et al 1981;Robert et al 1987;Hutson and Ruzicka 2000).…”
Section: Accretion Regions Of Chondrite Parent Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Cr, Ti, and Mo isotope anomalies (6)(7)(8)12) reveal a fundamental dichotomy in the genetic heritage of meteorites, distinguishing between "noncarbonaceous" and "carbonaceous" meteorite reservoirs (11). This distinction may reflect either a temporal change in disk composition or the separation of materials accreted inside [noncarbonaceous (NC) meteorites] and outside [carbonaceous (CC) meteorites] the orbit of Jupiter (11)(12)(13)(14). If the latter is correct, then the age of Jupiter can be determined by assessing the formation time and longevity of the NC and CC meteorite reservoirs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%