1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00467-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic dependence of the ion-ion potential in the systems 16O+58,60,62,64Ni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We now discuss the relation between the logarithmic slope L(E) and the surface property of the nuclear potential. For scattering processes, it seems well accepted that the surface diffuseness parameter a should be around 0.63 fm if V n is parametrised by a Woods-Saxon form [12][13][14]. In marked contrast, recent high-precision fusion data suggest that a much larger diffuseness, between 0.8 and 1.4 fm, is needed to fit the data [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We now discuss the relation between the logarithmic slope L(E) and the surface property of the nuclear potential. For scattering processes, it seems well accepted that the surface diffuseness parameter a should be around 0.63 fm if V n is parametrised by a Woods-Saxon form [12][13][14]. In marked contrast, recent high-precision fusion data suggest that a much larger diffuseness, between 0.8 and 1.4 fm, is needed to fit the data [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the present analyses, we have used realistic microscopic nuclear densities as reported in the literature [11,12,20]. The only parameters that were allowed to vary were those of the absorptive Woods-Saxon imaginary potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coupled-channel formalism the nuclear potential used is usually of the form of the WS potential. Recent systematic studies of the heavy ion cross section data using this formalism reveal that in order to have an agreement between the theoretical and experimental cross section data a WS nuclear potential with a diffuseness parameter of 0.8 to 1.4 fm is needed [1][2][3][4][5], which is greater than the accepted value of 0.63 fm obtained from the scattering studies [6][7][8]. There have been different attempts in order to explain this discrepancy [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%