In order to characterize the sulfide-derived SO 4 fluxes in the Rio Grande, we collected seasonally (from 2009 to 2011) riverine, agricultural drain and groundwater samples and analyzed them for their major element chemistries and the δ 34 S and δ 18 O of dissolved SO 4. The observed variation of δ 34 S (-4 to +8 ‰) and δ 18 O (-2 to +7 ‰) in the Rio Grande mainly resulted from mixing between sulfide-and sulfate-derived SO 4 of volcanic and sedimentary origin. Our S isotope mass balance suggests that the average sulfide-derived SO 4 flux usually accounted for 83-94 % (±10-20 %) of the sulfate source in the upstream Rio Grande and decreased downstream to 45-51 % because of increasing contributions of sulfate-derived SO 4. The sulfide-derived SO 4 was related to snow melt in the high elevation watersheds and recycling of surficial sulfate-rich salts by episodic water activity in dry areas at lower elevations. Additionally, elevated bedrock sulfide contents in volcanic and some sedimentary terrains of the studied area have been recognized as important factors contributing to sulfide-derived SO 4 in the Rio Grande. 1. Introduction Sulfide weathering is a biogeochemical process that releases sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4) into aquatic environments, accelerating the dissolution of rocks (e.g.; Vear and Curtis, 1981; Fennemore et al., 1998; Andersen et al., 2001; Balci et al., 2013). Given that sulfide oxidation is driven by O 2 in surface environments (Eq. 1), this process is believed to be partly important in controlling atmospheric O 2 levels over geological time (e.g., Bottrell and Newton, 2006). Indirectly, sulfide weathering can also affect the atmospheric CO 2 budget (Hercod et al., 1998; Calmels et al. 2007; Li et al., 2008). For example, sulfide oxidation in carbonate-rich catchments (Eq. 2) and the ultimate precipitation of this carbonate in ocean systems (Eq. 3) results in a net gain of CO 2 to the atmosphere (