2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic and in situ DRIFTS study of the CO2 methanation mechanism using Ni/CeO2 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
155
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
155
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been previously mentioned that CeO 2 support can offer significant advantages regarding the CO 2 methanation performance of Ni-based catalysts, when compared with other metal oxide supports [12]. However, Fe modification of Ni catalysts supported on CeO 2 -based supports appears to exert a negative influence on CO 2 methanation.…”
Section: Promotion With Fementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been previously mentioned that CeO 2 support can offer significant advantages regarding the CO 2 methanation performance of Ni-based catalysts, when compared with other metal oxide supports [12]. However, Fe modification of Ni catalysts supported on CeO 2 -based supports appears to exert a negative influence on CO 2 methanation.…”
Section: Promotion With Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni/CeO2 catalysts, for example, are much more active compared to Ni/Al2O3 or Ni/SiO2 catalysts. This is mainly attributed to ceria's intricate redox and O 2− -defect chemistry, with it being able to transport oxygen species and oxygen ion vacancies throughout its lattice, having higher basicity compared to other metal oxides that favours CO2 chemisorption and activation, as well as exhibiting a strong metal-support interaction that favours a higher Ni dispersion ( Figure 1) [12]. [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the main research on indirect methanation catalyst is nickel base. [2][3][4][5][6] Ni-based catalyst is the most suitable catalyst for indirect methanation because of its low cost and high catalytic activity and stability at a space rate of tens of thousands. [7,8] However, due to the fact that Ni-based catalysts are prone to sulfur poisoning and carbon deposition, strict desulfurization and water vapor transformation processes are often required in their application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Mo based catalyst can catalyze reaction under a broader hydrogen carbon ratio and has better sulfur resistance, desulfurization and water gas shift are omitted in the process flow. Methane reaction (1) and water vapor shift reaction (2) can take place simultaneously on Mobased catalyst, and the whole reaction process is carried out according to (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%