2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic analysis of the Blick Mead dog: A proxy for the dietary reconstruction and mobility of Mesolithic British hunter-gatherers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zooarchaeological evidence from Siraf seems to suggest a lesser dependence on marine protein by humans in the area compared to Qalhât. This is further supported by the isotope values of animals such as dogs and chickens, which have previously been considered as proxies for human diets 97 , 108 , 109 (however, see also Refs. 110 , 111 ) and which have mean δ 13 C values indicative of a terrestrial diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The zooarchaeological evidence from Siraf seems to suggest a lesser dependence on marine protein by humans in the area compared to Qalhât. This is further supported by the isotope values of animals such as dogs and chickens, which have previously been considered as proxies for human diets 97 , 108 , 109 (however, see also Refs. 110 , 111 ) and which have mean δ 13 C values indicative of a terrestrial diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In principle, these techniques can be applied to the majority of mammals (i.e., kangaroo [8] , domestic dogs [22] , human [27] , [28] ). However, the most common subjects are domesticated mammals, predominantly those with hypsodont molars — high crowning teeth that mineralise over a longer period, subsequently giving an elongated isotopic timeline (e.g.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incremental dentine sampling is notably less frequent in zooarchaeology than its enamel counterpart, in both the United Kingdom, and the international field [11] . Of the two studies included in this dataset [10] , [22] , both methodologies are drastically different, as they are applied to teeth with notably different morphology. Though some sampling protocols have been published for specific animals (i.e cattle: Zazzo et al 2006 [33] ), it is only with increased application that more specific protocols will be produced, that are better suited for specific species with different tooth morphologies.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers do not subject samples to chemical analysis or high temperatures. Most manually remove the outer tooth surface (e.g., (Glassburn et al, 2018;Moore et al, 2020), cementum, or dentine (e.g., Budd et al, 2000;Hedman et al, 2009;Pokutta et al, 2019;Rogers et al, 2019), and sometimes clean samples with deionized water or acetone (e.g., (Evans et al, 2006;Esker et al, 2019;Janzen et al, 2020). These approaches minimize damage to a specimen.…”
Section: Frontiers In Environmental Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%