2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopes reveal fluctuation in trophic levels of estuarine organisms, in space and time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows the trends observed by Vinagre et al (2012), who reported generally lower trophic levels for numerous estuarine organisms during the summer (wet) season. This was attributed to the higher abundances of micro-and macroalgae, which were consumed more extensively by lower trophic level organisms, thus resulting in a cascade up the food chain (Vinagre et al, 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This follows the trends observed by Vinagre et al (2012), who reported generally lower trophic levels for numerous estuarine organisms during the summer (wet) season. This was attributed to the higher abundances of micro-and macroalgae, which were consumed more extensively by lower trophic level organisms, thus resulting in a cascade up the food chain (Vinagre et al, 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, it is likely that the larger fish at Esengeni are feeding at a higher trophic level compared to the smaller fish. Vinagre et al (2012) suggest that as fish increase in size, their ability to eat larger and higher trophic level prey increases, due to the increase in mouth gape. At Catalina Bay and Charter's Creek, this trend is reversed, with smaller fish feeding at a higher trophic level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that TL changes seasonally or spatially depending on distributions of the prey and predator, demographic dynamics, climatic factors etc. (for example see Vinagre et al 2012). Alternatively, different methods of estimating TLs may suggest different values for a species, thereby potentially influencing overall TL.…”
Section: Implications Of Estimating Tls Using Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the issues concerning catch-based TL indicators, there is also the uncertainty involved in the estimation of a single TL for species with variable ontogeny. The TL of species varies with size and can vary in time and space (Jennings et al 2002, Vinagre et al 2012, necessitating some caution in TL-based indicator assessments (Caddy et al 1998). However, the effect of ontogenetic changes in the TL of species was found to be negligible within-species in comparison with between-species effects (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are the most abundant size class in the benthos and are closely connected to other compartments of the benthos (including prokaryotes and macrofauna; Baldrighi et al 2013). They play an important role in benthic food webs, not only as consumers (feeding on detritus, diatoms and algae, and preying on other small metazoans; Pergent et al 1994;Duarte and Cebrian 1996;Gee and Somerfield 1997;Mateo and Romero 1997;Gwyther 2003;Torres-Pratts and Schizas 2007;Mascart et al 2013Mascart et al , 2015, but also as producers (being a food source for macrofauna and fish; Gerlach 1978; Lebreton et al 2011;Vinagre et al 2012;Carpentier et al 2014). The abundance, diversity, distribution and functional properties of meiofauna can be affected by several abiotic factors, including temperature, salinity, hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, sediment grain size, oxygenation level and food availability (Ingels et al 2011;Lizhe et al 2012;Ngo et al 2013;Zeppilli et al 2013;Górska et al 2014;Pusceddu et al 2014b), and also, by biotic factors such as predation and competition (Tita et al 2000;Danovaro et al 2007;Nascimento et al 2011;Braeckman et al 2013;Boldina et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%