1960
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5582(60)81059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope shift and nuclear deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] According to Ionesco-Pallas, 19 the following equation holds for a given element, between isotopes differing by two neutrons :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] According to Ionesco-Pallas, 19 the following equation holds for a given element, between isotopes differing by two neutrons :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the improvement, however, the fact that this does not remove the discrepancy completely is accepted by most workers in the field. Meligy (1959) and Meligy et al (1960) are the only authors who have claimed otherwise ; they made use of the scattering data to evaluate the constants necessary to specify the trapezoidal distribution, and concluded that pel did not depart significantly from unity. Bodmer (1960) showed that the difference between his and Meligy's conclusions could be due only to their use of different interpretations of the scattering data, since Bodmer's general expression for the isotope shift reduced to Meligy's for the trapezoidal case.…”
Section: General Trends and Comparisons With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%