1994
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.49.762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope shift and hyperfine structure in Lu i and W i

Abstract: Isotope shifts and hyperfine structures of four transitions in W I have been measured as well as isotope shifts in Lu I by means of atomic-beam laser spectroscopy. Magnetic-dipole hyperfine constants 3 of '"W are determined for the atomic states 'D&, 'F&, and 'F3 of the 5d 6s6p configuration. The nuclear parameters A, and 5(r') are derived for W stable isotopes. J dependences of the isotope shifts are observed for the D term of the 5d6s configuration in LuI and the 'D term of the 5d 6s configuration in WI. Par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Nuclear mean-squared charge radii as a function of mass for W isotopes. 36,37 The two experimental determinations agree closely. instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Nuclear mean-squared charge radii as a function of mass for W isotopes. 36,37 The two experimental determinations agree closely. instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The magnitude of a potential mass-independent isotope shift in creating 183 W deficits was determined by treating the d 186 W as a variable, and calculating the nuclear volume isotope effect using the relationship between d 18n W and d 186 W in terms of the difference between their mean-squared nuclear charge radii. 35 Aufmuth et al 36 and Jin et al 37 measured the isotope shift in W using Fabry-Perot spectrometry and atomic-beam laser spectroscopy, respectively. From their experimental data, differences in mean-squared nuclear charge radii (dhr 2 i) as a function of nuclide mass are plotted for W isotopes in Fig.…”
Section: Nuclear Volume Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to recognize that this questionable value for 183 W from Angeli 49 has been abandoned in the most recent compilation of nuclear charge radii by Angeli and Marinova, 52 which, instead, provides a self-consistent data set that is in line with direct measurements of differences in mean-square nuclear charge radii for W isotopes using optical isotope shifts (OIS). Despite utilizing different techniques, such studies have obtained very consistent δ 〈 r 2 〉 values, 53–55 which is testament to the generally high accuracy and precision of data obtained by OIS. These δ 〈 r 2 〉 values show only subtle deviations from a mass-dependent trend (most pronounced for 180 W and 182 W) and, therefore, do not support a disproportionally small nuclear charge radius of 183 W (Fig.…”
Section: Origin Of the Analytical 183w Effectmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…King plot of the modified isotope shifts of 384.9 nm, 400.9 nm and 407.4 nm transitions with the 543.5 nm transition from W.G. Jin[20] as the reference transition. Factor of…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%