1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2890-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope Fractionation during Primary Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
293
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
12
293
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of isotope discrimination, evidence from higher plants shows that there is no fractionation for the transport of NO across cell membranes (Mariotti et al Ϫ 3 1982). However, isotopic fractionation would occur if, under natural conditions, the NO were in sufficient supply to sat-Ϫ 3 urate the nitrate reductase (Fogel and Cifuentes 1993).…”
Section: Model Constraints and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of isotope discrimination, evidence from higher plants shows that there is no fractionation for the transport of NO across cell membranes (Mariotti et al Ϫ 3 1982). However, isotopic fractionation would occur if, under natural conditions, the NO were in sufficient supply to sat-Ϫ 3 urate the nitrate reductase (Fogel and Cifuentes 1993).…”
Section: Model Constraints and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During photosynthesis, phyto-Ž . plankton fix dissolved inorganic C DIC in the surface water into organic biomass C by enzymatic Ž carboxylation reactions Descolas-Gros and Fontugne, 1990;Fogel and Cifuentes, 1993;Goer-. icke et al, 1993 .…”
Section: Comparison Of D 13 C Signatures In Plankton and Sediments Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the d 13 C POM from phytoplankton primary production that is exported from the photic zone by sedimentation preferentially removes 12 C. Thereby, the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) pool in the photic zone becomes gradually enriched in 13 C. As a consequence, increased primary production should be reflected by an increase in the d 13 C POM of sinking organic matter (Fogel and Cifuentes 1993;Hodell and Schelske 1998). However, factors other than primary production, such as changing pH, temperature, nutrient availability, atmospheric CO 2 concentration and its d 13 C value, varying amounts of allochthonous particulate organic matter (POM), shifts in phytoplankton species composition, plankton growth rate, and microbial processes, can influence lake internal carbon cycling and the stable carbon isotope composition of sinking POM on various timescales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%