1992
DOI: 10.1021/ac00035a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope dilution liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry using a particle beam interface

Abstract: The use of a particle beam (PB) Interface for quantitation by Isotope dilution LC/MS was Investigated. Coelution of singlelabeled Internal standards (IS) with native compounds caused enhancement of the IS signal. The magnitude of enhancement for [3-13Ci]caffelne was affected by several experimental parameters, but no differences were observed In the 12C/13C response ratios under these conditions or upon analyte Introduction via a gas chromatography (GC) Interface. No coelution enhancement was observed with [ 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are particle beam (PB) LC/MS (e.g. for caffeine in coffee), 8 with thermospray (TSP) LC/MS (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are particle beam (PB) LC/MS (e.g. for caffeine in coffee), 8 with thermospray (TSP) LC/MS (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, coeluting internal standards were found to enhance the response of both analytes and standards. An alternative explanation for carrier effects was proposed by Doerge et al No coelution enhancement was observed with [1,3,7- 13 C 3 ]caffeine, instead of [3- 13 C 1 ]caffeine, demonstrating that mass transfer effects and chemical complex formation do not affect PB transmission efficiency. Spectral overlap between native analyte and nonlinear responses caused the observed enhancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Linearity. In the literature, nonlinear calibration curves have been reported at low concentration levels under LC/PB-MS [3][4][5][6][7][8] as well as under SFC/PB-MS conditions, 9 resulting in poor detection limits, reduced dynamic range, and quantification difficulties. In a recent extensive review, Creaser and Stygall 25 discussed these phenomena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, quantitative analysis with the PB interface introduces several problems, because of rather large fluctuations in absolute response commonly observed in intra-and interday runs and non-linear quantity vs. response plots at lower analyte concentrations. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In addition, compared with TSP, ES and APCI, PB interfacing often results in poor detection limits. The merits of PB-MS have been thoroughly reviewed by Creaser and Stygall 10 and recently by Cappiello.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%