Isotonic quadriceps endurance is better associated with daily physical activity than quadriceps strength and power in COPD: an international multicentre cross-sectional trial
Abstract:Knowledge about modifiable determinants of daily physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is crucial to design effective PA interventions. The present study aimed to determine the contribution of quadriceps strength, power and endurance to daily PA in COPD. Additionally, for quadriceps endurance, we also aimed to determine to what extent the association varies according to the mode of movement (isotonic, isometric, or isokinetic). Using a multicentre cross-sectional … Show more
BackgroundPeople with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. Increased sedentary behaviour is associated with adverse health consequences and reduced life expectancy.AimThis mixed-methods systematic review aimed to report the factors contributing to sedentary behaviour in people with COPD.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) was conducted and supported by a clinician librarian in March 2023. Papers were identified and screened by two independent researchers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by data extraction and analysis of quality. Quantitative and qualitative data synthesis was performed.Results1037 records were identified, 29 studies were included (26 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) and most studies were conducted in high-income countries. The most common influencers of sedentary behaviour were associated with disease severity, dyspnoea, comorbidities, exercise capacity, use of supplemental oxygen and walking aids, and environmental factors. In-depth findings from qualitative studies included a lack of knowledge, self-perception and motivation. However, sedentarism in some was also a conscious approach, enabling enjoyment when participating in hobbies or activities.ConclusionsInfluencers of sedentary behaviour in people living with COPD are multifactorial. Identifying and understanding these factors should inform the design of future interventions and guidelines. A tailored, multimodal approach could have the potential to address sedentary behaviour.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023387335.
BackgroundPeople with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. Increased sedentary behaviour is associated with adverse health consequences and reduced life expectancy.AimThis mixed-methods systematic review aimed to report the factors contributing to sedentary behaviour in people with COPD.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) was conducted and supported by a clinician librarian in March 2023. Papers were identified and screened by two independent researchers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by data extraction and analysis of quality. Quantitative and qualitative data synthesis was performed.Results1037 records were identified, 29 studies were included (26 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) and most studies were conducted in high-income countries. The most common influencers of sedentary behaviour were associated with disease severity, dyspnoea, comorbidities, exercise capacity, use of supplemental oxygen and walking aids, and environmental factors. In-depth findings from qualitative studies included a lack of knowledge, self-perception and motivation. However, sedentarism in some was also a conscious approach, enabling enjoyment when participating in hobbies or activities.ConclusionsInfluencers of sedentary behaviour in people living with COPD are multifactorial. Identifying and understanding these factors should inform the design of future interventions and guidelines. A tailored, multimodal approach could have the potential to address sedentary behaviour.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023387335.
“…Evidence suggests that people with COPD avoid participation in PA owing to the perception of breathlessness, leading to a vicious circle of muscle deconditioning, further compromising their capacity to engage in PA [3,[9][10][11][12]. However, improving the level of PA in people with COPD is complex, as PA behavior itself is complex and multifaceted, including, for example, personal, physiological, and psychological elements as well as social and environmental factors [1,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, despite the wide range of available methods, their effect on PA in patients with COPD is limited, which might be attributed to an incomplete understanding of the determinants of PA behavior in the COPD population [12,15]. Although a variety of determinants of PA have been identified, including, but not limited to, exercise capacity, previous exacerbations, dyspnea, quadriceps dysfunction, and hyperinflation [11,[15][16][17], the available information does not clearly answer the determinants of PA in patients with COPD. This is mostly because the available research has been cross-sectional [15].…”
Background
Among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), low level of daily physical activity (PA) is the main risk factors for developing cardiovascular, metabolic, and musculoskeletal comorbidities. Increasing PA in people with COPD is complex as PA behavior itself is complex and multifaceted, including personal, physiological, and psychological elements as well as social and environmental factors. Although eHealth solutions such as web-based support or websites have shown positive effects on PA in people with COPD, the results are inconclusive, and it is still unclear how eHealth solutions might be used to support positive changes in PA behavior in people with COPD.
Objective
This study aimed to explore the perceptions of increasing objective PA when using a web-based eHealth tool among people with COPD.
Methods
This study was part of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with in-depth interviews between the 3- and 12-month follow-ups. The methodology used was constructivist grounded theory. All sampling included participants from the randomized controlled trial intervention group, that is, participants who had access to the eHealth tool in question and agreed to be contacted for an in-depth interview. Inclusion of participants continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in an inclusion of 13 (n=7, 54% women) participants aged between 49 and 84 years and living in 8 municipalities in Middle and Northern Sweden. Two interviews were conducted face-to-face, and the remaining interviews were conducted via telephone. All interviews were recorded using a Dictaphone.
Results
The analysis resulted in 3 main categories: welcoming or not welcoming action, having or lacking resources, and lowering the threshold. The first 2 categories contain barriers and facilitators, whereas the third category contains only facilitators. The categories lead to the more latent theme Perceiving enough control to enable action, meaning that it seems that perceiving the right amount of control is essential to maintain or increase the level of PA when using an eHealth tool among patients with COPD. However, the right amount of control seemed to depend on the individual (and context) in question.
Conclusions
The core category indicates that a need for a certain sense of control was interpreted as necessary for increasing the PA level as well as for using an eHealth tool to help increase the PA level. The eHealth tool seemed to strengthen or weaken the perception of control by either providing support or by being too demanding on the user. Perceptions varied depending on other environmental factors. The Fogg Behavior Model illustrated how motivational levels, ability levels, and functional triggers interact within our findings. Thus, this study provides further evidence for the importance of empowering the patients to boost their level of agency and their ability to improve PA levels.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030788
“…Moreover, muscle power showed a stronger association with functional performance than muscle strength in healthy older adults and patients with neurological diseases [7][8][9]. Similarly, cross-sectional studies have found associations between muscle power and functional performance [10,11] or physical activity [12,13] in individuals with COPD. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study has reported reduced lower extremity peak power in older adults with COPD compared with healthy subjects so far [14].…”
This study aimed to review the impact of training on muscle power in patients
with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Randomized controlled trials
evaluating the effects of exercise-based interventions on limbs muscle power and
rate of force development in COPD patients were investigated. Five international
databases were searched until October 2022. Meta-analyses were performed
calculating the mean difference or standardized mean difference. Risk of bias in
studies was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. A total of nine
studies were included in the analysis. There were concerns about risk of bias in
seven out of nine studies. Comparison of exercising and non-exercising groups
showed a significant effect of exercise in improving muscle power
(P=0.0004) and rate of force development (P<0.001), in five and
three trials, respectively. Four studies comparing different trainings showed no
significant results on muscle power (P=0.45). Eight to 16 weeks of
exercise-based intervention versus no intervention might be beneficial to
enhance upper and lower limbs muscle power and rate of force development in
people with COPD. In contrast, muscle power did not improve when different
training modalities were compared. Future studies performing power training in
COPD patients are encouraged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.