The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2cc04803e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isostructural σ-hydrocarbyl phospholide complexes of uranium, neptunium, and plutonium

Abstract: σ-hydrocarbyl complexes of the form [M(η5-PC4Me4)2(μ-η1:η6-CH2Ph)2K(η6-arene)] (M = La, Ce, Pr, U, Np, Pu; arene = benzene or toluene) were synthesised in one-pot reactions from [MI3(THF)4], or [U(BH4)3(toluene)] (M =...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbene center in 2Pu adopts a planar (∑∠ = 359.7(4)°) T-shaped geometry with a P–C–P angle of 170.8(4)°, which is statistically indistinguishable from the corresponding angle of 170.4(5)° in 2Np and close to the values of 167.6(4)° for 2Pr and 165.2(2)° for 2Sm . The PuC BIPM distance in 2Pu of 2.422(6) Å is the shortest Pu–C distance of any type to date, the previous being a Pu–CH 2 bond length of 2.542(19) Å in [{η 5 -P(CMeCMe) 2 } 2 ­Pu(μ-η 6 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) 2 K], and there are no other PuC double bonds reported for comparison. However, by the 3σ-criterion the PuC distance in 2Pu is indistinguishable to the NpC BIPM distance of 2.425(7) Å in 2Np .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The carbene center in 2Pu adopts a planar (∑∠ = 359.7(4)°) T-shaped geometry with a P–C–P angle of 170.8(4)°, which is statistically indistinguishable from the corresponding angle of 170.4(5)° in 2Np and close to the values of 167.6(4)° for 2Pr and 165.2(2)° for 2Sm . The PuC BIPM distance in 2Pu of 2.422(6) Å is the shortest Pu–C distance of any type to date, the previous being a Pu–CH 2 bond length of 2.542(19) Å in [{η 5 -P(CMeCMe) 2 } 2 ­Pu(μ-η 6 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) 2 K], and there are no other PuC double bonds reported for comparison. However, by the 3σ-criterion the PuC distance in 2Pu is indistinguishable to the NpC BIPM distance of 2.425(7) Å in 2Np .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The P–C BIPMH –P angle of 135.8(2)° is typical of the “open book” conformation of (BIPM TMS H) 1– . The Pu–C BIPMH distance in 1Pu of 2.732(4) Å is long compared to the sum of the single bond covalent radii of Pu and C (2.47 Å) but can be compared to the few examples of crystallographically authenticated formal Pu–C σ-bonds that include [K­(2.2.2-cryptand)]­[(η 5 -C 5 H 4 SiMe 3 ) 3 ­Pu­(η 1 -C 5 H 4 SiMe 3 )] (2.740(5) Å), [(η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 2 Pu­(μ-η 1 :η 5 -C 5 H 5 )] n (2.830(12) and 2.888(12) Å), [(η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 3 Pu­(CNCy)] (2.58(3) Å), and [{η 5 -P­(CMeCMe) 2 } 2 ­Pu­(μ-η 6 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) 2 K] (2.542(19) and 2.614(19) Å) . The iodide-bridged dimeric structure of 1Pu does not have any isostructural trivalent f-element (BIPM TMS H) 1– complexes for direct comparison, but for dimeric trivalent actinide complexes with (BIPM TMS H) 1– we previously reported [(BIPM TMS H)­Np­(Cl)­(μ-Cl) 3 Np­{(μ-Cl)­Li­(DME)­(OEt 2 )}­(BIPM TMS H)], which exhibits Np–C BIPMH distances of 2.831(4) and 2.838(4) Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations