2013
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isoniazid preventive treatment: predictors of adverse events and treatment completion

Abstract: This analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of IPT, with determinants of interruption and AEs being predictable and addressable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 23 publications related to RCTs and 55 related to nonrandomized studies were included. A flow diagram documenting the process of study selection is provided in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 23 publications related to RCTs and 55 related to nonrandomized studies were included. A flow diagram documenting the process of study selection is provided in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During follow-up, AEs were evaluated through patient's self-reporting symptoms (e.g., headache, nausea) and blood tests, generally focused on assessing liver enzyme levels. Based on symptom severity, the patient's general conditions, and lab abnormalities, a drug regimen could be momentarily stopped, definitively stopped, or changed [17].…”
Section: Preventive Treatment Regimens Follow-up and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive treatment was routinely offered to all LTB subjects, with an expected completion rate of about 74% (23,24).…”
Section: Tb Contact Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%