2012
DOI: 10.3836/tjm/1358951327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isometries and Maps Compatible with Inverted Jordan Triple Products on Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is what we have called in our recent paper [13] inverted Jordan triple product and defined as (A, B) → AB −1 A. The reason to introduce that operation is the following.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is what we have called in our recent paper [13] inverted Jordan triple product and defined as (A, B) → AB −1 A. The reason to introduce that operation is the following.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason to introduce that operation is the following. In [13] we have made attempts to generalize Mazur-Ulam theorem in a non-commutative context. That famous result states that the surjective isometries (i.e., surjective distance preserving maps) between normed real linear spaces are automatically affine.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important one among them, Proposition 11, shows that on certain substructures of groups surjective transformations that preserve a given generalized distance measure d which is compatible with the group operation, necessarily preserve locally the so-called inverted Jordan triple product (i.e., they respect the operation xy −1 x). We point out that results of this kind (which can be considered as noncommutative versions of the famous MazurUlam theorem) are first appeared in the paper [12]. In fact, below we closely follow the approach presented in Sections 2 and 3 of that paper but here we have to make several small modifications according to our present need.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Definitions 3.2 and 3.4 in that paper. Finally, we shall obtain Proposition 11, a statement similar to Corollary 3.10 in [12] which is the basic tool in the proof of our main result. holds for any x, y ∈ X.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation