2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201800895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomerization Processes on Organoruthenium Complexes Bearing κ2(P,C)‐Bidentate Ligands Generated Through Nucleophilic Addition to Coordinated Alkenyl Phosphanes

Abstract: Nucleophilic attack on complex [RuCl(η6‐C10H14){κ3(P,C,C)‐Ph2PCH2CH=CH2}][BPh4] (2) takes place, either to the metal or to the coordinated olefin depending on the nucleophile and the reaction conditions. The nucleophilic attack of phosphanes on the coordinated olefin leads diastereoselectively to complexes [RuCl(η6‐C10H14){ĸ2(P,C)‐Ph2PCH2CH(PR3)CH2}]+ bearing κ2(P,C)‐ligands obtained as a racemic mixture of the enantiomers RRuSc/SRuRC. These kinetically stable isomers, undergo an isomerization process leading … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particular case of the structures of 4 and 5, the core of the PDCA ligands is twisted compared to the free ligand, 9 which most likely arises from π•••π stacking interactions between an aminic aryl group and the phenyl phosphine fragment, and highlights the conformational flexibility of the PDCA ligand [C17plane-C24plane = 3.635(3) Å (4); C23plane-C9plane = 3.540(2) Å ( 5)]. The Ru-Cl and Ru-P distances for 1-5 (Table 2), are similar to related phosphorus-bound ruthenium compounds, 2,15,16,24,25,30 such as [Ru(p-cym){PH2(CO)NHCy}Cl2] and [Ru(p-cym){PPh2C≡CPh}Cl2] (Ru-Cl; ≈ 2.40 Å , Ru-P; ≈ 2.35 Å). 2,24 In addition, complexes 1-5 present intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the amidic proton and one of the metal-bound chlorides in the solid-state.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of [Ru(p-cym){pph2c(=o)n(h)r}...mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the particular case of the structures of 4 and 5, the core of the PDCA ligands is twisted compared to the free ligand, 9 which most likely arises from π•••π stacking interactions between an aminic aryl group and the phenyl phosphine fragment, and highlights the conformational flexibility of the PDCA ligand [C17plane-C24plane = 3.635(3) Å (4); C23plane-C9plane = 3.540(2) Å ( 5)]. The Ru-Cl and Ru-P distances for 1-5 (Table 2), are similar to related phosphorus-bound ruthenium compounds, 2,15,16,24,25,30 such as [Ru(p-cym){PH2(CO)NHCy}Cl2] and [Ru(p-cym){PPh2C≡CPh}Cl2] (Ru-Cl; ≈ 2.40 Å , Ru-P; ≈ 2.35 Å). 2,24 In addition, complexes 1-5 present intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the amidic proton and one of the metal-bound chlorides in the solid-state.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of [Ru(p-cym){pph2c(=o)n(h)r}...mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the particular case of the structures of 4 and 5, the core of the PDCA ligands is twisted compared to the free ligand, [9] which most likely arises from π• • • π stacking interactions between an aminic aryl group and the phenyl phosphine fragment, and highlights the conformational flexibility of the PDCA ligand [C17plane -C24plane = 3.545(2) Å (4); C23 plane -C9 plane = 3.540(2) Å ( 5)]. The Ru-Cl and Ru-P distances for 1-5 (Table 2), are similar to related phosphorus-bound ruthenium compounds [2,15,16,24,25,30] such as [Ru(p-cym){PH 2 (CO)NHCy}Cl 2 ] and [Ru(pcym){PPh 2 C≡CPh}Cl 2 ] (Ru-Cl; ≈ 2.40 Å, Ru-P; ≈ 2.35 Å) [2,24]. In the case of the crystal structure determinations for 1, 4 and 5, additional interstitial molecules of solvent were found (C 6 H 6 and toluene, respectively) and could be sensibly modelled.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of [Ru(p-cym){pph2c(=o)n(h)r}...mentioning
confidence: 81%