1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.53.2885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomeric cross-section ratio for the formation ofCom,g58in neutr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increasing incident neutron energy the ratio increases, showing that at higher excitation energies the formation of the high-spin isomer is more favored. This trend is similar to that for several other neutron-and charged-particle-induced reactions near their thresholds [16,17,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. The increase seems to be more pronounced for 195 Hg m,g than for 197 Hg m,g .…”
Section: B Isomeric Cross-section Ratiossupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the increasing incident neutron energy the ratio increases, showing that at higher excitation energies the formation of the high-spin isomer is more favored. This trend is similar to that for several other neutron-and charged-particle-induced reactions near their thresholds [16,17,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. The increase seems to be more pronounced for 195 Hg m,g than for 197 Hg m,g .…”
Section: B Isomeric Cross-section Ratiossupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Worth noting is that not only isomeric pairs with small differences in spins can be described by the model calculations (cf., for example, Refs. [17,[39][40][41][42][43][44]) but also the pairs with relatively large spin differences (as in this work), provided the input parameters are properly chosen. In this regard, two factors need special consideration: first, the input level scheme up to the continuum, and second, the spin distribution of the level density (η).…”
Section: B Isomeric Cross-section Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are already notable contributions to deuteron-induced reaction studies (e.g., Refs. [2][3][4][5][6]) that have taken into account only the statistical emission and eventually a "reduction factor" of the compound nucleus cross section due to "direct processes." Moreover, this reduction factor does not allow the distinction between processes such as the breakup and the stripping mechanisms that affect the different energy ranges of particles emitted through the decay of excited composite nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production yields of 58m Co and 58g Co from 57 Fe(d,n) were quantified via two methods: 1) indirectly via quantification of 58g Co activity over time (E γ = 811 keV) using an efficiency-calibrated HPGe detector, fitting the data points with the Bateman equation that contains the initial activities of the parent and daugher radionuclides, as it was done by Thisgaard et al [12]; and 2) via direct quantification of 58m Co (E γ = 24.9 keV) using an efficiencycalibrated low-energy HPGe detector as it was done by Sudár and Qaim [22]. The sample employed for this purpose was the 10 µL aliquot drawn from the 3.1 mL target dissolution.…”
Section: M Co and 58g Co Yields And Radionuclidic Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%