2017
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714605016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomer ratios for products of photonuclear reactions on 121Sb

Abstract: Abstract. Over the past several years various preequilibrium model approaches for nuclear reactions were developed. Diversified detailed experimental data in the medium excitation energy region for nucleus are needed for reasonable selection among these theoretical models. Lack of experimental data in this energy region does essentially limit the possibilities for analysis and comparison of different preequilibrium theoretical models. For photonuclear reactions this energy region extends between bremsstrahlung… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where S i , i = g, m -photo-peak area (in the gamma spectrum of the activation products), coefficient C includes self-absorption factor, true coincidence effects of cascade gammas and other effects, ϵ -full efficiency of gamma detection for the analysed gamma-line; f i , i = g, m -quantum yield of gamma-line for i-state decay (transition probability for this line); coefficients Λ j , j = 1, 9 are defined by t 1 , t 2 , t 3 , -irradiation time, cooling time and measurement time, respectively and determined in the ref [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S i , i = g, m -photo-peak area (in the gamma spectrum of the activation products), coefficient C includes self-absorption factor, true coincidence effects of cascade gammas and other effects, ϵ -full efficiency of gamma detection for the analysed gamma-line; f i , i = g, m -quantum yield of gamma-line for i-state decay (transition probability for this line); coefficients Λ j , j = 1, 9 are defined by t 1 , t 2 , t 3 , -irradiation time, cooling time and measurement time, respectively and determined in the ref [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EXP[30] → 109 Ag(γ, 5n) 104 Ag is well-described with LD4 and LD2 with pre-equilibrium mechanism; → for 113 In(γ, 3n)110 In the difference between theoretical models is of one order with statistical error of experimental data, and all theoretical models are in good agreement with experiment;121 Sb(γ, 5n) 116 Sb. EXP[22] →121 Sb(γ, 3n)118 Sb is well-described with LD5 and LD6 with enabled pre-equilibrium mechanism;121 Sb(γ, 3n)118 Sb . EXP[22] → 140 Ce(γ, 3n) 137 Ce is well-described with LD1 at 30 M eV ; and 70 M eV statistical error of experimental data covers all theoretical models;…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…EXP[22] →121 Sb(γ, 3n)118 Sb is well-described with LD5 and LD6 with enabled pre-equilibrium mechanism;121 Sb(γ, 3n)118 Sb . EXP[22] → 140 Ce(γ, 3n) 137 Ce is well-described with LD1 at 30 M eV ; and 70 M eV statistical error of experimental data covers all theoretical models;…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This article presents the results of the IR measurements obtained at linear accelerator LUE-40 RDC "Accelerator" NSC KIPT for the target nuclei: Zr [26], Nb [27], Mo [28], Rh [29], Ag [30][31][32], In [30,31], Sb [33][34][35], and Ta [36]. The calculations of theoretical IRs were performed using cross-sections of the TALYS1.95 code for six different level density models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%