2017
DOI: 10.31351/vol18iss1pp28-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Some Microorganisms from Bar Soaps and Liquid Soaps in Hospital Environments

Abstract: This study was designed to determine the colonization of the in-use hand washing soaps in hospital settings. It is a comparative cross-sectional research in a surgical specialties and Baghdad teaching hospital in Baghdad, Iraq. Swabs from surfaces of bar soaps and from liquid soaps via their applicator tips; at the sinks of toilets of hospital staff and working rooms of the wards were taken in January 2008. Conventional microbiologic methods were used for culture of the swabs and identification of the isolates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About a quarter of bar soap samples (4/17, 23.5%) were contaminated with Gram-negative bacteria and this proportion was considerably lower compared to liquid soap products. It was also lower than the >50% proportions reported in most previous publications [ 48 , 50 , 51 , 55 ]; in part, this difference may be due to a lower availability and a more selective use of bar soap at the present study sites. Most studies comparing side-to-side bar soap with liquid soap found that bar soap was the most frequently contaminated [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About a quarter of bar soap samples (4/17, 23.5%) were contaminated with Gram-negative bacteria and this proportion was considerably lower compared to liquid soap products. It was also lower than the >50% proportions reported in most previous publications [ 48 , 50 , 51 , 55 ]; in part, this difference may be due to a lower availability and a more selective use of bar soap at the present study sites. Most studies comparing side-to-side bar soap with liquid soap found that bar soap was the most frequently contaminated [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…It was also considerably higher than previously reported from LMIC which was—when intrinsic contamination and low counts of staphylococci were subtracted—between 0 and 17.1% [ 9 ]. The reasons for the presently high contamination ratio are probably an interplay of multiple factors conducive to contamination (see below) in a setting with fewer resources compared to the previously published articles which originated from higher income level countries in Southern and Western Asia [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%