2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.07509-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Potentially Novel Brucella spp. from Frogs

Abstract: ABSTRACTBacterial isolates from frogs were phenotypically identified asOchrobactrum anthropi, but 16S rRNA sequencing showed up to 100% identity withBrucella inopinata. Further analysis ofrecA,omp2a,omp2b,bcsp31, and IS71… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
109
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
109
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest an environmental source of infection for the hooded seal, rather than a horizontal or vertical transmission within the species. This is in line with the discoveries of Brucella species within a broader range of host species (Scholz et al 2008, El-Tras et al 2010, Eisenberg et al 2012, Fischer et al 2012) and exposure via heretofore unexpected pathways. 106: 187-196, 2013106: 187-196, 196 Tizard I (2000 Immunity in the fetus and newborn animal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our findings suggest an environmental source of infection for the hooded seal, rather than a horizontal or vertical transmission within the species. This is in line with the discoveries of Brucella species within a broader range of host species (Scholz et al 2008, El-Tras et al 2010, Eisenberg et al 2012, Fischer et al 2012) and exposure via heretofore unexpected pathways. 106: 187-196, 2013106: 187-196, 196 Tizard I (2000 Immunity in the fetus and newborn animal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, since 1994, several new Brucella species have been isolated from marine mammals (Foster et al, 2007) and voles (Scholz et al, 2008). More recently, several species of Brucella have been isolated from human (Scholz et al, 2010), non-human primates, foxes and frogs which determines the expanding nature of the genus (Schlabritz-Loutsevitch et al, 2009;Eisenberg et al, 2012;Hofer et al, 2012). It should, however, be noted that there are circumstances where Brucella species have been found to infect other host species in addition to their preferred host Mahmood et al / Int.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the last few years, potential novel species of Brucella have been isolated from various sources, including rodents (Tiller et al, 2010), different frog species (Eisenberg et al, 2012;Fischer et al, 2012;Whatmore et al, 2015), red foxes (Hofer et al, 2012) and a blue dotted ray (T. Eisenberg and H. C. Scholz, unpublished data), and are awaiting final genus affiliation. Although genome similarities of these potential novel species of Brucella are still above 90 % compared with classical species (Wattam et al, 2009;this study), the majority of these novel candidates carries genetic information not found in classical species but similar to genetic information found in other soil-living bacteria, such as Ochrobactrum, Paracoccus denitrificans, Agrobacterium and Sinorhizobium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%