2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of infraspinatus in clinical test positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,32,33 Other positions have been offered through previous studies, but these other positions have been shown to have increased posterior or middle deltoid activity along with increased IM activity. 10,11,26,34,35 This study did not attempt to try reciprocal inhibition techniques to quiet PD activity in any of these other positions. Third, the manual resistance applied toward external rotation was not quantified using any form of dynamometer.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,32,33 Other positions have been offered through previous studies, but these other positions have been shown to have increased posterior or middle deltoid activity along with increased IM activity. 10,11,26,34,35 This study did not attempt to try reciprocal inhibition techniques to quiet PD activity in any of these other positions. Third, the manual resistance applied toward external rotation was not quantified using any form of dynamometer.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent research questions the accuracy of traditionally used infraspinatus and subscapularis EMG sampling methods: the two parts of infraspinatus have been shown to exhibit differing activity levels during resisted shoulder external rotation in normals, 63 and independent innervation of both upper and lower portions of subscapularis has been described, with each portion demonstrating a variable role. 64 The detailed SMD calculations undertaken for this review permit the most definitive answer to date regarding differences in shoulder EMG activity in people with SPS.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, 22% of players suffer from at least one femoral tendon injury during a season. The risk factors commonly seen as predictive for knee or femoral joint injuries include a decreased hamstring/quadriceps ratio (H/Q) and a bilateral strength deficit, as well as the weakness of lower limb muscles [6,7]. Functional asymmetry of the lower limbs (side-to-side asymmetry) greater than 15% [1,8] may increase the risk of knee injuries [1,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%