2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of brucella strains in cattle from sedentary and nomadic communities and its public health implication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 99 research articles spanning 27 states (Plateau, Benue, Kwara, Kogi, Niger, Nasarawa, Borno, Gombe, Yobe, Bauchi, Adamawa, Jigawa, Kano, Kaduna, Katsina, Sokoto, Taraba, Zamfara, Enugu, Anambra, Ebonyi, Edo, Cross River, Akwa-Ibom, Lagos, Ogun, and Oyo states) and the federal capital territory (Abuja) from online database who reported Brucella infection from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2021 were reviewed. Brucellosis cases were reported in six geo-political zones in Nigeria; in NC [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], NE [ 15 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 99 research articles spanning 27 states (Plateau, Benue, Kwara, Kogi, Niger, Nasarawa, Borno, Gombe, Yobe, Bauchi, Adamawa, Jigawa, Kano, Kaduna, Katsina, Sokoto, Taraba, Zamfara, Enugu, Anambra, Ebonyi, Edo, Cross River, Akwa-Ibom, Lagos, Ogun, and Oyo states) and the federal capital territory (Abuja) from online database who reported Brucella infection from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2021 were reviewed. Brucellosis cases were reported in six geo-political zones in Nigeria; in NC [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], NE [ 15 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of brucellosis from vaginal swabs obtained from different animals was 12.4%, while a prevalence of 29.4% was observed in the lymph node of cattle from NW Nigeria. Thus far, only 7 out of the 104 publications reported culture detection methods [ 15 , 21 , 33 , 36 , 42 , 95 , 97 ], while a single publication reported molecular methods [ 78 ]. The Rose Bengal rapid test is the most popular diagnostic method reported by 11/14 publications on the detection of human brucellosis, while 95/107 publications reported RBPT as the detection method in animal samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However human brucellosis seroprevalence in abattoir workers will vary depending on the prevalence of the disease in livestock (54,55), infrastructure, training, sanitation and/or hygiene standards at abattoirs. This includes awareness of the disease and training on the use of PPE (20,21,22,25,54,55) job description ( slaughterers or butchers and workers with cut injuries have higher risks (16,53)) and consumption of unpasteurized milk products and raw meat (22,23,24,56). Risk factors differed from study to study indicating that these factors influence the disease prevalence in humans differently in each area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brucellosis is a complex disease humans can also become infected indirectly by consuming raw or undercooked meat, raw and unpasteurized milk, or milk products (16). A wide variety of risk factors that predispose abattoir workers to infection were identified in studies and include length of days at work; unknown health status of slaughtered animals; non-use of PPE; splash of animal secretion on the face; hand cut injuries during work; lack of hygienic measure in the work environmental; and poor knowledge and attitude of the workers and their perception of zoonoses as occupational hazards (16,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26). These studies were conducted in various countries/regions, each with its unique zoonotic disease profile in abattoir facilities that determine the risk factors identified in each study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%