1996
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.8.2.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Arabidopsis genes that differentiate between resistance responses mediated by the RPS2 and RPM1 disease resistance genes.

Abstract: The Arabidopsis disease resistance gene RPSP is involved in recognition of bacterial pathogens carrying the avirulence gene avrRpt2, and the RPMl resistance gene is involved in recognition of pathogens carrying avrRpml or avrB. We identified and cloned two Arabidopsis genes, AIGl and AIG2 (for a_vrRpt2-~nduced gene), that exhibit RPSP-and avrFfptbdependent induction early after infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola strain ES4326 carrying avrRpt2. However, ES4326 carrying avrRpml or avrB did not ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
175
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
11
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rps2 mutant, the avrRpf2-derived signal could still bind the RPS2 protein but in a nonproductive manner. This model is also consistent with data from Reuber and Ausubel(1996), which show that R gene interferente can, under some circumstances, work in either direction. (Differences in our observations can most likely be ascribed to slight differences in experimental conditions or vectors employed to deliver avr signals, and the sum of our data indicates a fine tuning of these signaling systems.)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In the rps2 mutant, the avrRpf2-derived signal could still bind the RPS2 protein but in a nonproductive manner. This model is also consistent with data from Reuber and Ausubel(1996), which show that R gene interferente can, under some circumstances, work in either direction. (Differences in our observations can most likely be ascribed to slight differences in experimental conditions or vectors employed to deliver avr signals, and the sum of our data indicates a fine tuning of these signaling systems.)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…org/ptmdb/results.htm). These include eight Rop GTPases, which regulate actin organization (Fu et al, 2001(Fu et al, , 2002Gu et al, 2003), pollen tube tip growth (Lin et al, 1996;Fu et al, 2001;Gu et al, 2003), ABA and auxin signaling (Lemichez et al, 2001;Li et al, 2001;Tao et al, 2002), and other processes; AIG1, which is involved in RPS2-and avrRpt2-dependent responses to Pseudomonas infection (Reuber and Ausubel, 1996); Aux2-11, a negative regulator of auxin signaling (Wyatt et al, 1993;Caldelari et al, 2001;Dharmasiri and Estelle, 2002); and other proteins. Thus, it is surprising that era1, ggb, and plp phenotypes are not more severe.…”
Section: Auxin Signaling In Ggb Mutant Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in (Figure 3). GST1 and AIG1 are induced in wild-type plants undergoing a resistant (hypersensitive) response after infection with P. syringae carrying avrRpt2 (Greenberg et al, 1994;Reuber and Ausubel, 1996). (Lawton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Multiple Defenses Activated In Acd6 Plants In the Absence Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%