2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of an indigenous Chlorella vulgaris from swine wastewater and characterization of its nutrient removal ability in undiluted sewage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be related to the existence of the symbiotic bacteria such as Verrucomicrobium, Proteobacteria and Frimicutes in real municipal wastewater (RMWW) that can be favourable to microalgae growth (Tandon and Jin, 2017;Toyama et al, 2018).The lower biomass concentration yield in the case of SWW (COD = 403 mgL -1 ) might be attributed the low N/P rate (~ 1.8), high COD concentration (~ 403 mgL -1 ) and turbidity which negatively affect the microalgae growth (Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Optimization Of Cultivation Condition At Different Cultivatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be related to the existence of the symbiotic bacteria such as Verrucomicrobium, Proteobacteria and Frimicutes in real municipal wastewater (RMWW) that can be favourable to microalgae growth (Tandon and Jin, 2017;Toyama et al, 2018).The lower biomass concentration yield in the case of SWW (COD = 403 mgL -1 ) might be attributed the low N/P rate (~ 1.8), high COD concentration (~ 403 mgL -1 ) and turbidity which negatively affect the microalgae growth (Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Optimization Of Cultivation Condition At Different Cultivatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High concentrations of organic matter, nutrients and toxic contaminants in SW have raised many concerns over their adverse effects on the environment and people's health (Cheng et al, 2018b). Various technologies have been developed for removing these pollutants from SW (Cheng et al, 2018b;Wen et al, 2017). Compared with conventional activated sludge and /or anaerobic treatment processes of SW, microalgae-based wastewater treatment systems have advantages of low energy requirements, little sludge formation, reduction of greenhouse emissions and productive use of wastewater.…”
Section: Sw Purification By Harvesting Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have confirmed that the cultivation of microalgae in SW is efficient for nutrients removal, and the maximum removal efficiency of nutrients and ranges of COD removal by different species of microalgae are depicted in Fig.2(a, b) (Abou-Shanab et al, 2013; Deng et al, 2018; Franchino et al, 2016; Luo et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2015; Wen et al, 2017; Zhu et al, 2013b).Under different cultivation conditions, different species of microalgae demonstrated a wide range of nutrients and COD removal efficiencies, with >90% NH4-N, 12.5-90% TN, 28-97% TP and 21-80% COD. NH4-N has been reported as the main form of inorganic nitrogen in SW(Wen et al, 2017). The efficiency of removing NH4-N by microalgae is relatively higher than the TN removal efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microalgae could play an important role in the high-strength swine wastewater remediation evidenced by a high member of published works. Microalgae species, especially Chlorella, are highly capable of absorbing nitrogen and phosphorus from swine wastewater (Ledda et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Wen et al, 2017). The study done by Wen et al found that the removal e ciencies of TN and TP can reach 90.51 % and 91.54 %, respectively, by using Chlorella vulgaris isolated from swine wastewater to treat undiluted swine slurry with a relatively low nutrient pro le ( Chlorella strain isolated from a fecal storage tank to purify swine manure digestate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%