1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of 88F Actin Mutants of and Possible Alterations in the Mutant Actin Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect is particularly pronounced in several antimorphic alleles in which DMLC2 is not detected at all. (11) These results are consistent with the proposal that DMLC2 interacts with actin, perhaps through its extended N terminus. (38) More importantly, however, these results indicate that the assembly of functional thin and thick myofilaments may not be as independent of each other as is often assumed.…”
Section: Proteomicssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect is particularly pronounced in several antimorphic alleles in which DMLC2 is not detected at all. (11) These results are consistent with the proposal that DMLC2 interacts with actin, perhaps through its extended N terminus. (38) More importantly, however, these results indicate that the assembly of functional thin and thick myofilaments may not be as independent of each other as is often assumed.…”
Section: Proteomicssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The hydrophobic plug mutation G268R, which incorporated into normal actin structures in NIH3T3 despite reduced co-polymerization capacity, is an example of one of these. When G268D was expressed homozygously in the indirect flight muscle of Drosophila melanogaster, it induced wavy fibers but the heterozygote was normal (An and Mogami, 1996). L267D in yeast actin resulted in a mild phenotype (a cold-sensitive polymerization defect) (Chen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypercontraction is a phenomenon that leads to muscle defects like thinning and tearing, following uncontrolled actomyosin interactions of otherwise normally assembled sarcomeric structures (Nongthomba et al 2003). Mutations leading to hypercontraction have been localized in structural genes such as the upheld gene (up 101 ) (Fyrberg et al 1990;Nongthomba et al 2003), flightin (fln 0 ) (Reedy et al 2000), Actin88F (An and Mogami 1996;Nongthomba et al 2003), Myosin heavy chain (Mhc 6 , Mhc 13 , and Mhc 19 ) (Kronert et al 1995), wings up A (wupA hdp-2 ) (Beall and Fyrberg 1991;Nongthomba et al 2003), the protein phosphatase genes flapwing (flw 1 , flw 6 , and flw 7 ) (Raghavan et al 2000;Pronovost et al 2013), and calcineurin B2 (canB2 EP(2)0774 ) (Gajewski et al 2006). Mutations producing hypercontraction fall in a large repertoire of proteins, suggesting that there could be multiple grounds for reaching the phenotype.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%