2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3lc50580d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and mutational analysis of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients with magnetic sifters and biochips

Abstract: Detection and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may reveal insights into the diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. Technologies for isolating CTCs developed thus far suffer from one or more limitations, such as low throughput, inability to release captured cells, and reliance on expensive instrumentation for enrichment or subsequent characterization. We report a continuing development of a magnetic separation device, the magnetic sifter, which is a miniature microfluidic chip with a de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate use of the Ephesia chip as a CTC enrichment platform, Autebert et al isolated CTCs from 6/8 prostate cancer and 4/5 breast cancer patient samples and compared their results to CellSearch; they achieved similar or higher CTC counts in 10/13 samples. Another microfluidic-based immunomagnetic capture technology that features a unique architecture is the Magnetic Sifter (Earhart et al, 2013). In contrast to other microfluidic designs, the Magnetic Sifter uses a vertical flow configuration that sieves the sample through a dense array of 3808 square magnetic pores (40 Â 40 mm) arranged in a honeycomb pattern.…”
Section: Epispotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate use of the Ephesia chip as a CTC enrichment platform, Autebert et al isolated CTCs from 6/8 prostate cancer and 4/5 breast cancer patient samples and compared their results to CellSearch; they achieved similar or higher CTC counts in 10/13 samples. Another microfluidic-based immunomagnetic capture technology that features a unique architecture is the Magnetic Sifter (Earhart et al, 2013). In contrast to other microfluidic designs, the Magnetic Sifter uses a vertical flow configuration that sieves the sample through a dense array of 3808 square magnetic pores (40 Â 40 mm) arranged in a honeycomb pattern.…”
Section: Epispotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro/nano-cantilevers [1,2], stripe/wires [3,4], and pores [5,6] are some of the platforms. There are also magnetic particle-based Food and Drug Admisnistration (FDA) approved isolation technologies available in the market [7], and in the literature, many microfluidic devices have been developed for the separation of various biomolecules [4,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic techniques mix antibody-functionalized nanoparticles Hayes et al 2006) or rods with a blood sample (Talasaz et al 2009;Powell et al 2012;Earhart et al 2014), often after pre-processing steps such as centrifugation or dilution; the antibodies on the particle or rod surfaces bind with the antigens on the cell surface and then can be separated from the bulk sample by applying a magnetic field. Microdevice techniques engineer device geometries on the scale of the target cells and use combinations of diffisional mixing, cell-wall interactions, and varying shear stress to isolate rare cells by bringing them into contact with a fixed, antibody-functionalized device wall; these devices have used micron-scale obstacles in linear arrays (Nagrath et al 2007) and radial arrays (Murlidhar et al 2014), herringbone-like device floors to increase and control the frequency of interactions between the cells and the capture surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%