1997
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-60.9.1135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and Identification of Adherent Gram-Negative Microorganisms from Four Meat-Processing Facilities

Abstract: Biofilms are described as a matrix of microorganisms which have adhered to and colonized a surface. Once formed, biofilms are difficult to remove and may be a source of contamination in food-processing environments. In this study, stainless-steel chips were fixed to surfaces adjacent to food-contact surfaces and cast-iron chips were suspended in the floor drains of four meat-processing plants. Biofilm formation was quantified by staining the attached cells and viewing them under epifluorescence microscopy. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, this will allow studies on biofilms that are more relevant than those produced using laboratory models. The approach has been used to compare hygienic properties of different materials (Guobjornsdottir et al 2005), to identify microbiota in food production factories (Hood and Zottola 1997;Mettler and Carpentier 1998;Gunduz and Tuncel 2006), and to detect biofilm formation (Holah et al 1989;Gibson et al 1995), and recently, we used this approach to study the effect of kitchen cleaning methods (Røssvoll et al 2015). However, little has been done to evaluate how well the microbiota developed by this approach reflects the microbiota developed in situ, where the surfaces can be of a different quality and (or) condition than the coupons used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, this will allow studies on biofilms that are more relevant than those produced using laboratory models. The approach has been used to compare hygienic properties of different materials (Guobjornsdottir et al 2005), to identify microbiota in food production factories (Hood and Zottola 1997;Mettler and Carpentier 1998;Gunduz and Tuncel 2006), and to detect biofilm formation (Holah et al 1989;Gibson et al 1995), and recently, we used this approach to study the effect of kitchen cleaning methods (Røssvoll et al 2015). However, little has been done to evaluate how well the microbiota developed by this approach reflects the microbiota developed in situ, where the surfaces can be of a different quality and (or) condition than the coupons used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table 2) were found on the surface of SS coupons at trolley #1, soup tank (bottom) and soup filling table as an evident to support the biofilm formation. Pseudomonas has been found to adhere easily to the surfaces and is excellent biofilm formers as reported in several studies [28,29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…McGuire & Swartzel [1989] demonstrated that primary adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel and Tefl on was enhanced in the presence of surface-associated milk proteins. According to Hood & Zottola [1997], the material conditioned by diluted milk was better for attachment of pathogens than the whole milk. It was as- sumed that some molecules, like bovine serum album (BSA), inhibited cells attachment process to solid surfaces [Hood & Zottola, 1997].…”
Section: Solid Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hood & Zottola [1997], the material conditioned by diluted milk was better for attachment of pathogens than the whole milk. It was as- sumed that some molecules, like bovine serum album (BSA), inhibited cells attachment process to solid surfaces [Hood & Zottola, 1997].…”
Section: Solid Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%