2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-011-0834-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and characterization of sulfonamide-degrading bacteria Escherichia sp. HS21 and Acinetobacter sp. HS51

Abstract: With the intensive application of sulfonamides in aquaculture and animal husbandry and the increase of sulfonamides discharged into the environments, there is an increasing need to find a way to remediate sulfonamidecontaminated environments. Two bacterial strains capable of degrading sulfonamides, HS21 and HS51, were isolated from marine environments. HS21 and HS51 were identified as members of Escherichia sp. and Acinetobacter sp., respectively, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Degradation of each sulfonam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Untreated control soils showed no degradation of the applied sulfamethazine. Although microbial degradation of sulfonamides (24,30) and even the utilization of sulfonamides as the only carbon and energy source have been reported (31), detailed knowledge concerning the bacterial strains involved and particularly the extent to which degradation is accomplished is still lacking. Just one study providing profound information about both topics, the microbial sulfonamide degradation and the bacteria involved, was quite recently published by Topp et al (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untreated control soils showed no degradation of the applied sulfamethazine. Although microbial degradation of sulfonamides (24,30) and even the utilization of sulfonamides as the only carbon and energy source have been reported (31), detailed knowledge concerning the bacterial strains involved and particularly the extent to which degradation is accomplished is still lacking. Just one study providing profound information about both topics, the microbial sulfonamide degradation and the bacteria involved, was quite recently published by Topp et al (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supernatants were obtained by filtering the mixture through 0.45-μm nylon membrane prior to HPLC analysis. To determine whether the reduced DES was due to accumulation in bacterial cells, DES associated with the bacterial cells was detected as described by Zhang et al (2012) with minor modification. Cell pellet was resuspended in 200-μl protein denaturing buffer (100 mM NaH 2 PO 4 , 10 mM Tris-Cl, 8 M urea, adjusted pH to 8.0 using NaOH) and lysed for 1 h by gently shaking.…”
Section: Des Degradation By Bacterial Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafiltrated supernatant was subjected to LCQ Fleet high sensitivity multistage ion trap mass spectrometer system. MS was operated in the electron spray ionization mode with a positive polarity and scanned by normal mass range from 100 to 2,000 m/z antibiotics and sulfonamides increases Choung 2007, 2010;Li and Zhang 2010;Zhang et al 2011), the degradation of sulfadoxine by Pseudomonas sp. DX7 may be potentially exploited to eliminate sulfadoxine contamination from the environment.…”
Section: Degradation Of Sulfadoxine By Pseudomonas Sp Dx7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Acinetobacter sp. have been shown to degrade sulfapyridine and sulfathiazole (Zhang et al 2011). Until now, no specific bacterial strain had been isolated with the capacity to degrade sulfadoxine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%