Genes containing the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter fused to open reading frames coding for tomato proteinase inhibitor I, tomato inhibitor II, and potato inhibitor II were expressed in transgenic tobacco plants. Inhibitor I and II proteins were identified by immunoblotting and quantified by immunoradial diffusion. Both inhibitors exhibited the molecular weights found for the native proteins in their natural environments. Extracts of leaves from transformed plants contained inhibitory activities against trypsin and chymotrypsin that reflected the levels of inhibitor I or H protein present. The results demonstrate that in tobacco leaves the introns of both inhibitor I and inhibitor II genes were excised correctly and that pre and prepro inhibitor I and II proteins were correctly processed. Growth of Manduca sexta larvae (tobacco hornworms) feeding on leaves of transgenic plants containing inhibitor II, a powerful inhibitor of both trypsin and chymotrypsin, was significantly retarded, compared to growth of larvae fed untransformed leaves. Levels of inhibitor H protein as low as 50 jg/g of tissue moderately affected larval growth, whereas levels above 100 ,ug/g severely reduced growth. The presence of tomato inhibitor I protein, a potent inhibitor of chymotrypsin but a weak inhibitor of trypsin, in transgenic tobacco leaves had little effect on the growth of the larvae. These experiments indicated that trypsin inhibitory activity, but not chymotrypsin inhibitory activity, was mainly responsible for the inhibition of larval growth.Potato and tomato plants contain two small multigene families that code for two powerful inhibitors of serine proteinases, called inhibitor I (monomer Mr 8100) and inhibitor II (monomer Mr 12,300) (1). Inhibitor I is an inhibitor of chymotrypsin that only weakly inhibits trypsin at its single reactive site (1), whereas inhibitor II contains two reactive sites, one of which inhibits trypsin and the other of which inhibits chymotrypsin (1). Members of both gene families are expressed in leaves in response to chewing insects or other severe mechanical damage (2). Both inhibitors are synthesized as precursors and undergo posttranslational modification (3)(4)(5) to form the mature proteins, which are sequestered in the vacuole (6). These inhibitors are thought to help defend the plant, by reducing the digestibility and nutritional quality of the leaves, against insect predators (7). Both cDNAs (4, 5) and genes (8, 9) that encode inhibitors I and II have been isolated and characterized. These are now being employed to further investigate the role of proteinase inhibitors in plant defense.It was previously shown (10) that transformation of tobacco plants with a gene encoding a cowpea trypsin inhibitor was able to confer increased resistance against predation by Heliothis virescens larvae. In order to assess the potential of inhibitor I and inhibitor II for increasing the natural defenses of crop plants through transformation, genes encoding these inhibitors were stably introduced ...