2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-012-9761-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Iguana delicatissima (Reptilia: Iguanidae), new perspectives for investigation of hybridization events with Iguana iguana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When did Iguana insularis diverge from other species in this genus? Studies of iguana morphology (Breuil 2013, 2016) and genetics (Stephen et al 2013; Valette et al 2012; Vuillaume et al 2015) have shown there are at least three ancient lineages ( I. delicatissima and the iguanas of Central America and South American) in the genus Iguana , with a genetic divergence approximated by a molecular clock of 1.29 million years for every 1% sequence divergence at the ND4-Leu Locus (Malone et al 2000). With approximately 10% divergence (Malone & Davis, 2004) between I. iguana and I. delicatissima , the age of separation of these two species is therefore about 11-12 My; but according to Hedges et al (2015), the two lineages could have diverged as much as 22.8 My ago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When did Iguana insularis diverge from other species in this genus? Studies of iguana morphology (Breuil 2013, 2016) and genetics (Stephen et al 2013; Valette et al 2012; Vuillaume et al 2015) have shown there are at least three ancient lineages ( I. delicatissima and the iguanas of Central America and South American) in the genus Iguana , with a genetic divergence approximated by a molecular clock of 1.29 million years for every 1% sequence divergence at the ND4-Leu Locus (Malone et al 2000). With approximately 10% divergence (Malone & Davis, 2004) between I. iguana and I. delicatissima , the age of separation of these two species is therefore about 11-12 My; but according to Hedges et al (2015), the two lineages could have diverged as much as 22.8 My ago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data set comprised 36 individuals representing seven insular and continental populations (Table 1). A panel of 17 microsatellite markers were amplified as described by Valette et al (2012) and Vuillaume et al (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its current range is much reduced and the conservation status of I. delicatissima has recently been elevated on the IUCN Red List to Critically Endangered due to its restricted and severely fragmented distribution. These factors, along with reports from 2017 of the first sightings of I. iguana on the island of Dominica, which was considered one of the most secure strongholds of I. delicatissima, have highlighted the extreme vulnerability of this species (van den Burg et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two genera of the Iguanidae, Cyclura and Iguana, are native to the West Indies: the genus Cyclura is restricted to the Bahamas and Greater Antilles, while the genus Iguana is native to the Lesser Antilles and parts of Central and South America. Two species of Iguana are currently recognised: the Critically Endangered Lesser Antillean iguana Iguana delicatissima (van den Burg et al 2018), the green or common iguana Iguana iguana (classified by IUCN as Least Concern Bock 2018). The latter includes several native subspecies, including Iguana iguana insularis (first described and evaluated as Vulnerable by Breuil et al 2019) and Iguana iguana sanctaluciae (described and evaluated as Critically Endangered, Breuil et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of a possibly ancient, introduced I. iguana population in the Lesser Antilles at Montserrat, St. Lucia, and Saba, however, and the weak genetic diversity of the I. delicatissima populations among islands, make the island colonization and evolution scenario of these two iguanas difficult to understand. Approaching such questions can be done using genetic data (Malone and Davis, 2004;Stephen et al, 2013;Valette et al, 2013), but subfossil remains preserved in archaeological and paleontological deposits also can provide direct evidence of past iguana populations to suggest new hypotheses or test genetic assumptions. Such material is available in the Lesser Antilles, where there exist dozens of archaeological sites of pre-Columbian age that contain iguana remains (Grouard, 2001(Grouard, , 2007(Grouard, , 2010(Grouard, , 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%