2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and application of bacteriophages to reduce Salmonella contamination in raw chicken meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
62
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the average latent period for all the phages was 20 ± 3.8 min while the burst size was 260 ± 144 PFU per host cell. These results were consistent with those reported previously (35). Two phages, EC118BPV and EC366VPV, had the shortest latent period (15 min) while EC11B2PV and EC3A1PV had the longest latent period (25 min).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the average latent period for all the phages was 20 ± 3.8 min while the burst size was 260 ± 144 PFU per host cell. These results were consistent with those reported previously (35). Two phages, EC118BPV and EC366VPV, had the shortest latent period (15 min) while EC11B2PV and EC3A1PV had the longest latent period (25 min).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Host range is one of the most important criteria when selecting phages intended for biocontrol of antimicrobial foodborne pathogens (35). Eight phages were selected to determine phage host range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that these four phages belong to the Myoviridae and Siphoviridae families. These findings are consistent with other studies that have found that phages specific to Salmonella are members of the Caudovirales order (Bardina, Spricigo, Cortés, & Llagostera, 2012;Duc et al, 2018). The resistances of the four bacteriophages to heat and pH were similar (Figure 4), thereby indicating their stability to prevent or reduce S. Enteritidis contamination under different food processing environments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A variety of interventions based on chemical, physical, or biological agents have been developed to prevent the bacterial contamination of food. However, these methods suffer from major shortcomings due to toxicity, alteration of the quality of the food, and unsuitability for practical applications (Aymerich, Picouet, & Monfort, 2008;Chen et al, 2012;Duc et al, 2018;Grant, & Parveen, 2017;Troy, Ojha, Kerry, & Tiwari, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%