2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and analysis of articular joints wear debris generated in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Articulating surfaces of medical implants, resulting from total joint replacement surgeries, generate a large number of particles as a result of wear process over time [5]. Damage from wear can directly affect the implanted device causing loss of tolerance, friction and therefore the expected longevity of the device is minimised [6]. wear particles also initiate an immune response inducing aseptic loosening, and osteolysis [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Articulating surfaces of medical implants, resulting from total joint replacement surgeries, generate a large number of particles as a result of wear process over time [5]. Damage from wear can directly affect the implanted device causing loss of tolerance, friction and therefore the expected longevity of the device is minimised [6]. wear particles also initiate an immune response inducing aseptic loosening, and osteolysis [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage from wear can directly affect the implanted device causing loss of tolerance, friction and therefore the expected longevity of the device is minimised [6]. wear particles also initiate an immune response inducing aseptic loosening, and osteolysis [6]- [8]. The cellular mechanism of the response to wear particles involves macrophages, monocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts cells [9]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last ten years, particular attention was paid to metal on metal (MoM) coupling for arthroprosthesis, because of lower volumetric wear compared to metal on polyethylene (MoP) coupling, as well as higher durability than ceramic on ceramic (CoC) coupling [5][6][7][8]. Mechanical and chemical degradation of joint devices (MoP or MoM) leads to polyethylene and metal debris formation, which means release of metal particulate and ions [9][10][11][12]. Polyethylene debris, produced in the size range of biological activation, are the principal cause of osteolysis [13] and implant failure for aseptic loosening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of polyethylene wear debris from replacement bearing surfaces is considered to be a major problem for long-term outcome of total joint arthroplasty. [1][2][3][4][5] Cross-linking has been introduced to reduce the wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Cross-linking may provide significant advantages over conventional UHMWPE, regarding the mechanical and wear properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%