Isolating effects of terrain and soil moisture heterogeneity on the atmospheric boundary layer: Idealized simulations to diagnose land‐atmosphere feedbacks

Abstract

The effects of terrain, soil moisture heterogeneity, subsurface properties, and water table dynamics on the development and behavior of the atmospheric boundary layer are studied through a set of idealized numerical experiments. The mesoscale atmospheric model Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) is used to isolate the effects of subsurface heterogeneity, terrain, and soil moisture initialization. The simulations are initialized with detailed soil moisture distributions obtained from offline spin-ups using a coupled surface-subsurface model (ParFlow-CLM). In these idealized simulations, we observe that terrain effects dominate the planetary boundary layer (PBL) development during early morning hours, while the soil moisture signature overcomes that of terrain during the afternoon. Water table and subsurface properties produce a similar effect as that of soil moisture as their signatures (reflected in soil moisture profiles, energy fluxes, and evaporation at the land surface) can also overcome that of terrain during afternoon hours. This is mostly clear for land surface energy fluxes and evaporation at the land surface. We also observe the coupling between water table depth and planetary boundary layer depth in our cases is strongest within wet-to-dry transition zones. This extends the findings of previous studies which demonstrate the subsurface connection to surface energy fluxes is strongest in such transition zones. We investigate how this connection extends into the atmosphere and can affect the structure and development of the convective boundary layer.

Forest Disturbance Feedbacks From Bedrock to Atmosphere Using Coupled Hydrometeorological Simulations Over the Rocky Mountain Headwaters

“…The resulting evaporative cooling in convergent zones (e.g., the St. Vrain River in the St. Vrain watershed north of Clear Creek) can even be seen in spatial patterns of surface energy and PBL. These spatial structures—with local increases complementing remote decreases in PBLH—are large‐scale instances of similar patterns shown at the smaller idealized scale (Rihani et al, ). The planetary boundary layer responds to disturbance at the land surface, but the magnitude and direction of its response is contingent upon topography and antecedent moisture conditions.…”

Shift in the Temporal Trend of Boundary Layer Height in China Using Long‐Term (1979–2016) Radiosonde Data

“…T sfc indicates the overall energy of the lower atmosphere and is positively associated with GHGs (Raval & Ramanathan, ). SM is directly related to the surface energy budget through both the sensible heat and the latent heat terms, and at low levels, soil moisture generally comes with a high surface sensible heat flux, facilitating the development of the BLH (Mccumber & Pielke, ; Rihani et al, ; Sanchez‐Mejia & Papuga, ). LTS is defined as the difference in potential temperature between 700 hPa and the surface and, therefore, indicates the thermodynamic state of the lower troposphere (Guo, Deng, et al, ; Guo, Su, et al, ), where a larger LTS generally corresponds with a more stable lower troposphere.…”

Why Do Large‐Scale Land Surface Models Produce a Low Ratio of Transpiration to Evapotranspiration?

“…Szilagyi et al () further confirmed the link between groundwater and ET in Nebraska through observational data. In turn, these impacts may propagate into the atmospheric boundary layer, affecting the planetary boundary layer height, air temperature, convective available potential energy, and convection precipitation (e.g., Gilbert et al, ; Keune et al, ; Maxwell et al, ; Rahman et al, ; Rihani et al, ). A growing body of literature also suggests that lateral subsurface flow can substantially enhance the T / ET ratio (Fang et al, ; Maxwell & Condon, ), and this effect becomes slightly more significant for higher model resolutions (Shrestha et al, ).…”